Thursday, June 30, 2011

Landfill's Life Dwindling - Sault Star

Sault Ste. Marie's landfill capacity has decreased in the past year.


An annual report to council states that there is a capacity for about 9.1 years, or until early 2019.




>
>


That's down from the report a year earlier where the capacity at the landfill was set at about 9.8 years, the report shows.


The capacity is calculated with a formula based on a five-year disposal rate.


Council learned that about 86,524 tonnes of material was received at the landfill in 2010, slightly more than what had been collected in previous years.


Of the material collected, about 76 per cent (66,014 tonnes) was landfilled and six per cent exported for recycling or reuse. Another 18 per cent was used as daily cover material.


The landfill also operates a leachate collection system, which is designed to intercept leachate before it leaves the site and is pumped into he sanitary sewer collection system.


The system, operational since 1992, runs along the south boundary of the landfill and was later expanded in a northerly direction in the southeast corner of the landfill along the old creek alignment.


While the landfill site has received its share of complaints from nearby neighbourhoods, in 2010 a total of 18 odour complaints were received.


Establishing a passive landfill gas vent flare system has reduced the number of odour complaints.


With newer landfill gas regulations imposed in 2008, the city also has had an "active" collection system implemented at the landfill sitewhich has been operating since December.

The monitoring report also indicates that the ground water quality meets standards and any surface water quality issues ar not an effect of the landfill.


The landfill has also completed a methane mitigation project in the past year to monitor and provide warning to those within all facilities at the landfill if methane gas level concentrations get too high.


Since 2008, methane gas concentrations have been in the explosive range at one of the gas monitors.


Staff expect elevated methane concentrations as the landfill grows westerly, the report to council states.


The landfill gas collection project has been considered more onerous than expected and has accrued additional costs.


Council had previously approved a budget of $408,000 for the project but another $10,000 was approved at Monday's council meeting.


View the original article here

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Council alerted to groundwater threat - ABC Online

Updated June 6, 2011 12:46:00

The Eurobodalla Shire Council is being pushed to conduct tests of the groundwater supply at Broulee on the New South Wales far south coast.




>
>


The Moruya-based property owner Damien Rogers says the Council dumped tankers of toxic leachate at an old tip site in the early 1990s.


Mr Rogers says the substance poisoned cattle at the time, and there is a chance it could still have an adverse impact on a major freshwater aquifer.


He says the Council has failed to act.


"The dumping occurred, and we don't know what was in that leachate, but we know it was strong enough to kill cattle," he said.


"Whether it's lasted in the environment, that's for the experts to decide.


"They can test it and find out quite easily, it's not a big test.


"But that's the only way of knowing, otherwise we're shooting in the dark to try and speculate whether there's anything that's lasted in the environment."


He says there is a chance the substance remains highly toxic.


"A lot of the poisons that come out of leachate tips are very toxic, and they can last in the environment for many years," he said.


"So residents have to know that the water is safe.


"In old tips, everything went in there, from DDT, dioxins, PCBs; everything's possible in that tip."


For more, go to the South East News blog.

Tags: environment, pollution, water-pollution, broulee-2537, moruya-2537

First posted June 6, 2011 11:29:00


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

EPA inspects company's alleged dumping site - Pacific Daily News

Environmental officials, escorted by U.S. Marshals, inspected an alleged dump at Lujan Towing & Auto Parts shop in Toto in hopes of putting a stop to possible pollutants contaminating Guam's groundwater.

> >
It's not the first time the company is being investigated for collecting debris that could be harming the island's environment.
Roland Gutierrez, a Guam Environmental Protection Agency environmental health inspector, said during yesterday's inspection, officials measured the length, width and height of the alleged dump to try to determine "the amount of leachate that may come out of it."
Gutierrez declined to provide details regarding the investigation, saying a full report will be provided to Guam EPA when the investigation is completed, possibly next week Wednesday.
Ivan Quinata, Guam EPA administrator, said the company doesn't have the permits to operate "what appears to be a dump."
"That's an automatic citation for that alone," he said, noting that additional citations may be made following the investigation.
Gutierrez said a report of the full investigation should be completed by Wednesday.
Property owners have declined to comment. Pacific Daily News has made numerous calls, left phone messages and sent an email message to Ray Lujan with the company, but has yet to receive a response. Lujan is listed as the manager for Lujan's Salvage Yard and Towing Services in the document.
Guam Environmental Protection Agency is investigating dumps within a three-mile radius of the Ordot dump and the island's shoreline. The U.S. District Court ordered the investigation as part of efforts to close the Ordot dump, which has been cited for decades as an environmental hazard.
Gutierrez said authorities shut down an illegal dump at the same location in 2005. That investigation and subsequent closure of the dump was prompted by a fire at the dump site.
The environmental health inspector said as far as he could recall yesterday, there were no fines levied on the towing and spare parts company.
"What they did was they complied with the notice of violation and cleaned up so they weren't fined," Gutierrez said.
He couldn't say whether a second violation, if found, would result in stiffer penalties.
Gutierrez did say he expects to return to the site to ensure that business owners are removing the debris from the site and sending the debris to the appropriate facilities.
According to Guam EPA's report filed with U.S. District Court yesterday, environmental officials have "conducted a visual inspection of each road and/or street" in Asan, Maina, Nimitz Hill, Agana Heights, Hag?t?a and Sinajana, "and no dumpsites were found."
Ordot dump is expected to close Aug. 31. Even after the closure, "much work remains to be done to mitigate and properly manage the pollution that will be produced for many years into the future," the court documents state.
The government of Guam agreed to close the Ordot dump and open the Layon Landfill as part of a consent decree stemming from a U.S. EPA lawsuit alleging the Ordot dump was polluting the island's underground water source and nearby streams and rivers.
View the original article here

Monday, June 20, 2011

Garbage in Hyderabad sold out - Deccan Chronicle

June 1: As cities grow and create more garbage, disposal of the waste has become a big problem for municipal corporations around the country, including the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. So the trend to generate power from garbage, thus keeping cities clean, saving municipal bodies money, and increasing power capacity in a power-hungry city, can only be welcomed.




>
>


The waste to electricity project will mean a saving of nearly Rs 200 crore per annum for the GHMC, the amount it spends on collection, transportation, dumping and disposal of 3,500 metric tonnes of garbage generated every day in the city, which will now be done by private operators. The privately owned waste-to-energy plants will make money by converting the municipal solid waste into useful energy (electricity). GHMC has signed an agreement to supply 700 metric tonnes of garbage to Selco power plant at Shadnagar, another 700 metric tonnes per day to RDF Power Plant at Bibinagar, 700 metric tonnes to Sri Venkateshwara Green Power Project Ltd. at Ibrahimpatnam and the remaining to Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. at Jawaharnagar. What’s more, the Tata Power Trading Company, a giant in the private power sector, has come forward to purchase the power generated by RDF and Sri Venkateshwara power plants. Selco already has an agreement with APTransco, and Ramky is all set to finalise its power purchase agreement with a private company. Urban development experts and environmentalists have welcomed the waste to energy route for garbage disposal. As private companies stand to make crores of rupees, they will ensure that no garbage is left on the streets, and that it is collected and supplied to them for production of power every day.


Eminent environmentalist Mr K. Purushotham Reddy said: “The sate government should set up a mechanism to monitor that the remains of the garbage, after energy is produced, is disposed off in a scientific manner. Let’s hope the private garbage power plants project is successful and Greater Hyderabad becomes a more eco-friendly city.” Venkateshwara Projects will take 700 metric tonnes of garbage daily from GHMC and produce nearly 2 lakh power units per day, according to its executive director Mr N.S.R. Naidu. The 12 MW garbage power plant of Venkateshwara will be operational soon.


The 11 MW waste-to-energy plant of RDF Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. at Bibinagar has already signed a power purchase agreement with Tata Power, which will buy power at Rs 3.60 per unit. The plant will produce 2 lakh units of power every day. The SELCO power plant at Shadnagar and Sriram Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd. at Vijayawada, were the first in the country to start producing power out of garbage. They have a long-term agreement with APTransco to purchase power from them.


In fact, all metropolitan cities are now promoting garbage power plants as not only a solution to dispose of garbage in an environmentally sound way but also to turn a profit while doing so.


Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd.’s project director, Ms Padmaja, said that the company’s Rs 897 crore integrated solid waste management project in Greater Hyderabad will not only set up the garbage power plant but also establish a sorting plant, compost units and leachate sumps at the Jawaharnagar dumping yard.


These three main components of the project will gradually put an end to air and ground water pollution besides allowing the segregation of garbage at the dumping yard if not at the doorsteps of citizens. Leachate sumps will suck the liquid from the garbage while the sorting plant will segregate materials that are harmful to the environment and those that can be sent for recycling or to compost units. The GHMC additional commissioner, health and sanitation, Mr S.K. Aleem Basha, said the demand for supply of garbage to the private power plants is increasing. “All the agreements are in place for supply of 3,500 metric tonnes of garbage to the power plants. One power plant has recently urged us to increase their quota from 700 metric tonnes to 1,000 metric tonnes of garbage per day,” he said.


View the original article here

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Plant to accept more leachate - Waste Management World

BUCHANAN - The wastewater treatment plant in Buchanan will accept up to three times the amount of leachate that it now takes in from the Southeast Berrien County Landfill.


It's a move that will save the landfill $250,000 per year and generate about $50,000 annually for the city, Buchanan City Manager William Marx said.


Leachate is water after it drains through the landfilled trash and collects at the bottom of the dump. It contains a variety of chemicals and other matter from contact with the refuse.


"This is quite a savings for the landfill. We have the ability to take this," said Buchanan Mayor Carla Cole, who's also a member of the Southeast Berrien County Landfill Authority board.


Under an agreement drafted in 1984, Marx said the city's wastewater treatment plant has taken up to 25,000 gallons of leachate per day from the landfill.


Additional leachate from the landfill has been shipped by tanker to a treatment plant in Elkhart at a much higher cost because of transportation costs.


Marx said he recently had lunch with landfill general manager Sonny Fuller and listened to his desire to reduce the expense of shipping leachate.


Marx said he began checking with operators at the wastewater plant and learned as much as 100,000 gallons of leachate per day can easily be safely treated at the plant.


The Buchanan City Commissioners unanimously voted in favor of an agreement this week that allows the landfill to transport additional leachate to the plant through an existing pipeline.


Marx said the move has been approved by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.


He said the landfill will have to perform some upgrades to its lift station to increase the flows.


Commissioner Dave Hagey applauded what he said he felt was a sample of the creative solutions ordinary citizens don't realize are occurring in local government.


"These are the kind of things percolating below the surface that people don't understand," Hagey said.


Cole said transporting leachate by tanker costs the landfill $115 per hour.


"This is where our biggest savings is going to be," the mayor said.


View the original article here

Saturday, June 18, 2011

A community's concern - Inquirer.net

Editorial Cebu Daily News

The opposition of a homeowners association to plans by the Cebu City government to allow a Protestant coalition to build a cemetery at the Osmeña shrine in barangay Kalunasan, Cebu City springs from their concern that it would pollute the groundwater sources in the area.




>
>


This is understandable owing to a previous incident in which residents of barangay Guba complained about the pollution of their groundwater by leachate from a nearby cemetery.


A school near the shrine also complained about the decline in their enrollment as parents didn’t want their children to study near a cemetery. As if that wasn’t enough, the Capitol and barangay Lahug have entered the picture, further complicating the situation.


Barangay Lahug councilor Mary Ann delos Santos said the Osmeña shrine forms part of Lahug and asked the council to rescind the contract between the city and the Evangelical Christian Coalition of Cebu Inc. since her barangay wasn’t consulted.


The Capitol also questioned why the city government would allocate 4.7 hectares of land to the cemetery when the shrine was intended to be part of a development into a park as cited in the compromise agreement between the city government and the Capitol.


Then there is the position of senior citizens groups who asked City Hall not to clear the trees that provides them with fresh air. The arguments continue on but in his typical hard-line position, former mayor and Rep. Tomas Osmeña of Cebu City’s south district isn’t budging.


All claims to pollution of groundwater are baseless, he said, even as he offered a compromise by promoting the installation of a columbary that would house the ashes of the dead to defuse fears of water pollution. But Osmeña is clearly not yielding.


It would be interesting to see what Mayor Michael Rama’s position is on this, given that he and Osmeña are not on speaking terms. Despite this, the fact that the residents don’t want the presence of the cemetery would have to be factored in and it is the burden of the Protestant group to win over these residents to their project.


One has to question how the group managed to convince Osmeña to allow them to build a cemetery within the shrine considering that the place is dedicated to the memory of his forebears and thus should be developed into a park.


Environmental and health authorities should examine the claims of the residents to see whether their fears are justified. Their evaluation may yet determine whether or not the project should see the light of day or be dropped altogether. The community’s health is the paramount concern.


Tags: Evangelical Christian Coalition of Cebu Inc. , Government contracts

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

Copyright 2011Cebu Daily News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


View the original article here

Unlocking energy from our fetid garbage tombs - CTV.ca

ANH CHU - The Globe and Mail

In Calgary's Shepard landfill, the seagulls squawk like a dissenting mob amid the drone of heavy machinery flattening trash. But one hectare of land sits with no apparent activity above ground. Below the surface lies the potential to transform the way cities manage their solid waste.

This site is home to the Biocell, a pilot project whose premise – garbage as a renewable resource – sounds more like wishful thinking than reality.

“Landfills are garbage graveyards, or perpetual storage,” says Patrick Hettiaratchi, biocell research lead at the University of Calgary's Schulich School of Engineering. Unexpected finds have been unearthed from old landfills, where even organic waste such as yard clippings and kitchen scraps are slow to biodegrade in the dry, tomb-like conditions.

“It's quite easy to read a newspaper from the 1970s,” says Corey Colbran, landfill operations leader at the City of Calgary.

Conventional sanitary landfills try to minimize the two common hazards of trash: leachate (toxic garbage juice) and methane (a major contributor to greenhouse gases). The biocell is a sustainable, closed-loop system in which the negative byproducts of garbage become advantages.

Leachate is collected at the bottom of the cell and recirculated through a network of pipes – meaning the toxic soup doesn't need to burden wastewater treatment plants. The moisture from the leachate speeds up the degradation of the garbage, and because no oxygen is present, the anaerobic environment accelerates the production of methane. The research team at the Schulich School of Engineering is finding ways to augment the leachate to degrade tough materials.

Normally, more methane is not a desirable outcome. But within the biocell, the gas is collected and converted into electricity. From 2007 to 2009, more than 800,000 cubic metres were converted into electricity, which then helped power Calgary’s light-rail transit system.

The production of methane for electricity is not new, but the landfill biocell is unique. A two-day workshop of international engineering consultants provided the genesis for the pilot project in 2003. “People have tried gas extraction before. People have tried landfill mining. We said, ‘Why don't we combine these ideas?’” explains Dr. Hettiaratchi.

Methane production is the first of three stages. “The first stage is an anaerobic reactor, where we get the gas out. For the second stage, we put air into the system and make it aerobic, so it becomes like composting,” says Dr. Hettiaratchi. About 70 per cent of the waste in Calgary's landfills is organic.

Once methane production slows, phase two begins and air is dispersed throughout the cell to mimic the aerobic biodegradation that occurs during composting. The resulting compost-like material should be stable enough to use in the city's parks.

In the third and last phase, the area will be mined for non-biodegradable materials. “Dirty plastics could be used to manufacture things like park benches,” Dr. Hettiaratchi explains.

Calgary has about 30 to 40 years of landfill space left, and a biocell could extend that to 100 years. It would also be cost-effective. “The landfill becomes a cheap processing facility,” says Dr. Hettiaratchi. Researchers picture biocells processing landfill waste in networks of 10 cells – with eight in operation concurrently, one in the filling stage and one in the excavating stage.

The project is as collaborative as the techniques suggest. In addition to the university, the City of Calgary works with consulting engineering firm Stantec for design and construction, and CH2M Hill for operations.

The pilot has yet to be completed and its results analyzed, but the bottom line is the biocell must prove itself as a financially viable option for cities.

“The focus is on making sure all the technology works” before applying for patents for particular components, says Dr. Hettiaratchi, noting that any experiment may have unexpected results.

“Our initial research estimate, as far as construction was concerned, was that the biocell would cost 50 per cent more than the typical landfill,” he says, estimating that Calgary has spent about $2-million to $3-million so far in the biocell's construction, not including operations and management.

“Regardless of what methods a municipality chooses to manage its organic waste, there will still be landfills of some description, because some materials are just not recyclable or reusable,” says Stantec's Don Davies.

The biocell can generate energy, create compost, recover other resources and reduce the amount of leachate and greenhouse gas emissions produced, but the biggest advantage could come in a finite resource that all burgeoning cities face: space.

“Space is at a premium at landfill sites, so excavating the site is critical because you're then able to reuse that area,” says Mr. Colbran.

The biocell project has already garnered awards for innovation in engineering. If the results remain as promising as they have been in Calgary's dry and wintry climes, which prolong the process, the benefits are far-reaching. In fact, a waste management company from Mumbai has already discussed adopting the technology.

Mr. Davies speaks best to the necessity of innovative thinking when it comes to garbage: “Whether it's the biocell concept or some other method of processing organic waste, this is the future.”


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 07, 2011

$8 million Gedney Way landfill cap moves forward in White Plains - The Journal News | LoHud.com

WHITE PLAINS — The contamination is minimal and problems are manageable. But that doesn't mean it won't cost a lot to handle.

Following nearly 25 years of environmental study, the city is preparing to embark on an $8 million plan to fully cap the Gedney Way landfill with 2 feet of dirt.

To update residents on the project, the city and state Environmental Conservation and Health departments will hold a "public information session" next Thursday.

"It's certainly been a long-term process that we've done in conjunction with the state, and there's been an enormous amount of investigation and data, so that we would leave no stone unturned," said city Public Works Commissioner Joseph "Bud" Nicoletti.

The 40-acre landfill was used from 1948 to 1979 to dump many forms of waste, mostly ash from the city's former incinerator on Kensico Avenue. Since the dumping ended, the site has been used for composting leaves, yard waste, stumps and brush, and also as a Public Works storage area.

Since 1986, the DEC, city and city environmental consultant AKRF have been investigating the grounds to document its contents and see if contamination existed around the site.

Contaminated groundwater was found on site, as well as in two stormwater lines and stormwater manholes beneath the site, according to a report attached to the public meeting notice.

Other than that — despite the presence of ash, leachate, methane, and drums of chemicals and cleaning solvents — little to no air, water or soil contamination was found around the site, including in an adjacent stream and in nearby homes.

The city had capped the site with dirt, though inconsistently.

Some portions were buried under much more than 2 feet of soil; others had far less, Nicoletti said.

The DEC is requiring the city to create a minimum of 2 feet of dirt throughout the property, while also making other fixes — with a total cost expected to be $8 million.

The project is part of the city's capital improvements plan and will likely be paid for through borrowing.

Nicoletti said the city will bid out the project after next Thursday's meeting. He said he hoped for Common Council approval in July, so construction could start that month.

The project is expected to last from six months to a year, he said.

Local activists have pushed for another option at the landfill, saying for years they wanted the land to be converted into a park.

Resident Don Hughes said a full remediation would likely cost much more money, but would be a more long-term solution for the site.

"We really abused the area over the last 63 years," he said. "It would be nice to do more than just cover it up. I would really like more of an effort to remediate and undo some of the damage that's been done."


View the original article here

Monday, June 06, 2011

Looking west to solve India's issues - Times of India

Looking west to solve India's issues - Times Of India.

PANAJI: Learning to treat leachate from solid waste; gathering expertise that can alter behaviour of high-risk HIV patients; studying what drives volunteering-culture in the West; analyzing the causes of suicides - these are a few interesting topics that the Indian Fullbright scholars are planning to research on this year.




>
>


(Video is not related to the article.)


Indians are increasingly utilizing the United States-India Educational Foundation's (USIEF) Fulbright scholarships to improve social conditions in their homeland. The USIEF's scholarships promote academic, professional and cultural exchange between fellows from India and the US each year. This year, 175 Fulbright scholars from across the country, including 139 Fulbright-Nehru fellows, are preparing to leave for the US.


From among the scholars, 130 of them gathered at Cavelossim-based resort for a three-day pre-departure orientation and brainstormed on how to better living conditions in India and help resolve social issues. TOI caught up with some of them to get a glimpse of their interests.

"Bangalore, where I live, is known as the suicide capital of India. Tere is a lack of research on the molecular marker causing patients to commit suicide," says Dr Hari Prasad, who will pursue a doctorate in public health. He will also focus on the relationship between poverty and infectious diseases and apply it to the Indian scenario on his return to NIMHANS in Bangalore.

Doctoral student of Anna University at Chennai, Suneethi Sundar, is concerned about the worsening problem of untreated solid waste in India. "The leachate from solid waste is essential to replenish ground water. I am looking at the use of bacteria to remove nitrogen from leachate before it reaches ground water and putting it back after treating it," says Sundar.


"There are numerous Indian fellows who have and want to make a difference," said USIEF executive director, Adam Grotsky remarking about the research done by Fullbright scholars .


Fellow Tarun Cherukuri is a unique case study himself. An engineer trained at Birla Institute of Technology, Pilani, Cherukuri gave up a high-paying job at Hindustan Lever to dedicate himself to the education of underprivileged children.


"I was thoroughly satisfied professionally and financially. My job at Hindustan Lever was to improve ice-creams. I found myself thinking what am I doing when there are millions who cannot afford an ice-cream a year in India," said Cherukuri. "In the US, community service is common. But in India we make a deal of volunteering. I want to learn what drives community activism and implement it in India."



April 1, 2010 Narela-Bawana to be the first scientific landfill site

View the original article here

Sunday, June 05, 2011

Inayawan a calamity area, says City Council - Sun.Star

Thursday, May 26, 2011


THE Cebu City Council yesterday declared the under a state of calamity.


The legislative body cited the absence of a proper wastewater, leachate (garbage juice) and sludge treatment facility inside the landfill, which poses risks on the environment and on the health of nearby residents.


The declaration would enable City Hall to use the local government’s calamity fund for the construction of a wastewater, leachate and sludge treatment facility inside the landfill. The treatment facility is said to cost at least P12 million.


The City also wants to use the calamity fund to rent heavy equipment for the centralized material recovery facility (MRF) in the 15.4-hectare facility in Barangay Inayawan.


Hazard


City Councilors Eduardo Rama and Nida Cabrera, in a resolution, pointed out that since the start of the operation of the landfill in 1998, there was no provision for a wastewater, leachate, and sludge treatment facility.


“This poses a potential environmental hazard on the coastal waters and health hazards on the residents,” the councilors said.




>
>


The councilors said liquid from garbage dumped at the landfill was found to have leaked out of the facility and polluted the Mactan Channel.


Rama, chairman of the committee on public services, justified the council’s declaration in an interview with GMA Balitang Bisdak yesterday.


Preparedness


“It’s more on calamity preparedness,” he said.


The council’s decision was endorsed by the Cebu City Disaster Coordinating Council (CCDCC).


“An impending calamity is seen if the City adopts no preventive measures to curtail the negative effects of the problems in the landfill,” a CCDCC board resolution said.


These problems, CCDCC said, include the defective equipment for garbage leveling, compacting and sloping of dumpsite, no proper treatment facility and the need for various equipment for the processing of biodegradable and non-biodegradable wastes inside the facility.


Last April 1, City Hall disallowed the dumping of unsegregated wastes—biodegradable matter mixed with non-biodegrdable materials—at the Inayawan landfill. Only segregated wastes are brought to the facility for processing.


Biodegradable materials are processed and placed in a compost to produce organic fertilizer. Non-biodegradable items that can be recycled or reused are set aside to be sold to junk shops.


Published in the Sun.Star Cebu newspaper on May 26, 2011.


View the original article here

Saturday, June 04, 2011

Judge Orders Guam EPA to Inspect Questioned Dump Sites Around Ordot Dump - Pacific News Center

Sunday, 29 May 2011 14:04 Written by Kevin Kerrigan Friday, 27 May 2011 17:54

Guam News - Guam News


Guam - At the request of  Federal receiver GBB, District Court Judge Francis Tydingco-Gatewood has ordered Guam EPA to investigate a number of dump sites within a 3 mile radius of the Ordot Dump.




>
>


In a Special Report to the Court filed Thursday, the receiver cites "several dump sites" near the Ordot Dump, and one very large one. The exact number is not stated.


Its not clear whether any of these sites are properly permitted, but the receiver notes that none of them are lined and therefore a source of leachate, "all dump sites produce leachate," states the receiver's report and leachate is "one of the principal causes of pollution from the Ordot Dump and one of the primary reasons for the Consent Decree."




>
>


Read Federal Receiver GBB's request for order


In its request for an inspection of these sites, GBB notes that the "identification of all sources of  leachate and other groundwater contamination is an important step" in the final closure of the Ordot dump which is slated to close August 31.


 


And the leachate from these other, unlined dumps, are a "potential problem for accurately understanding and mitigating the pollution coming from the Ordot Dump itself " and "potentially complicates the process for final closure of the Ordot Dump."




>
>


Read the District Court's Order


GBB requested, and the Judge agreed in an order issued Friday, to require Guam EPA to investigate all dump sites within a 3 mile radius of the Ordot Dump to determine:


1. The compliance of these dump sites with applicable Guam and federal laws and regulations;
2. The size and approximate leachate potential for each such dump site;
3. The party responsible for the site;
4. The potential of the dump site to complicate the closure of the Ordot Dump; and
5. The steps recommended or taken by GEPA to eliminate these dump sites as a source of contamination of the environment in the vicinity of the Ordot Dump.



View the original article here

Friday, June 03, 2011

State plans upgrades at closed landfill, By LAUREL BEAGER, Editor - International Falls Daily Journal

County considers transferring ownership of site to state


As the state of Minnesota prepares to spend $5.5 million to improve a closed landfill in International Falls, the question of whether Koochiching County or the state should own the property has been raised.


The landfill located in International Falls is owned by Koochiching County, but is subject to a landfill cleanup agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which holds an easement to the property and response action equipment on the property, according to Tom Newman, land manager with the Closed Landfill and Superfund programs of the Remediation Division of the MPCA.


Newman met with the county board this week to propose that the county turn total ownership of the property over to the state.


Newman told the board that the MPCA used proceeds from the sale of state general obligation bonds for capital costs of environmental response actions that the MPCA took at the landfill beginning in 2003. As a result, certain requirements on sale or other disposition of the property are imposed. To ensure that requirements of state law and the commissioner’s order are carried out, a declaration must be signed by the state and county and recorded.


Newman explained that the state is responsible for the long-term care of the landfill, but Koochiching County also has liability as the owners of the property.Newman said the transfer of ownership to the state would make his duties easier.




>
>


(Video has no connection with the article.)


Meanwhile, Newman said the MPCA is seeking bonding money this session to make improvements at the landfill site. Should the Legislature not grant the money, the MPCA would seek it the next year.


He said the $5.5 million would be used to place an impervious cover over the landfill; upgrade the system that collects water leaching from the landfill, thereby improving drainage; and increase the amount of leachate removed from the site from 6,000 gallons per day to 24,000 gallons per day. Should the leachate amount increase as expected, the state would consider installing a forced main line from thel leachate pond to the North Koochiching Sanitary Sewer District.


Commissioners asked if the county could dovetail on the state’s project should it move forward with installing a line to the sewer treatment plant by connecting nearby residences to sewer at the same time.


Newman said the county project would need to meet the time line of the state.


Commissioners asked questions about liability should the leachate “plume” move off the site toward residences.


Newman said the state accepts no liability, just responsibility.


“My job is to make sure the plume does not move off site,” he said, adding that he would guide development and the county could implement development plans to avoid installing wells nearby.


Should the plume move toward existing residences in a natural way, the state would take action to keep people safe, including installing filtration systems on wells in the area of concern.


However, he said, questions could arise should a high capacity well be installed nearby that draws the plume toward residences and contaminates wells.


A closed landfill in Northome was also discussed, and Newman said the state could provide easements for access to logging areas, but the landfill itself could not be used as a staging area for logs.


“All our concerns are about houses and development — people putting wells in,” he said.


Newman said at some point in the future, all properly closed and handled landfills can be used. However, he said it may take generations before the properties stop producing methane gas and leachate allowing for development.


He said a bill at the Legislature now would allow the state to “delist” all or portions of closed landfills that staff feel are safe for development. Now, he said, the closed landfills can not be used.


Newman was asked to research whether the state would consider a reverter clause that would provide state ownership to the property, but would revert back to county ownership at some point.
View the original article here