Saturday, April 30, 2011

City commits millions to leachate management - Open File

The city is moving ahead with plans to build a leachate treatment facility at the municipally owned Trail Road landfill—more than seven years after city council first floated the idea.




>
>


Over the next three years, $9 million has been set aside to study and build the on-site facility, which will need to be operational by 2015, city spokesperson Jocelyne Turner confirmed in an email.


Landfill leachate is water, generally rain or snow, that seeps through garbage and extracts potentially harmful contaminants. It can pose serious environmental risks if it ends up in the groundwater—precisely the concern that Barrhaven residents brought to council in 2004, when the city was planning to build a pipeline under their homes that would shuttle leachate into the sewer system.


Later that year, council directed the city to study on-site leachate management as well. But the plans were shelved after a new stormwater plan at the Trail Road site, combined with a shift in the city’s overall waste management strategy, led to a significant decline in the amount of leachate being produced, said Turner.


No leachate escaped the site in 2010, she said. But current landfill usage rates mean that by 2015, the landfill cap—the impermeable barrier that separates the contaminated waste from the surface—will need to be removed to expand the site. And with the cap gone, snow and rain will collect and need to be treated, she said.


Most of the overall cost—$8 million—has been earmarked for the construction of the treatment facility in 2014. An additional $800,000 in 2012 will go towards “pretreatment” of the leachate, while the final $200,000 will be spent this year on consulting fees “to select the most effective leachate treatment” at the site, said Turner.


Although the city has not revealed what options are currently being considered, one possible idea might be to incorporate some sort of membrane bioreactor system into the facility, says Roberto Narbaitz, an engineering professor at the University of Ottawa.


Such a system would use bacteria to break down the leachate, which would then be filtered through a thin ceramic membrane, leaving hazardous solids behind, says Narbaitz. The relatively expensive technology would give citizens “bang for your buck” at the start of the process, he says. But once the contaminants are no longer biologically reducible, “it’s not so fantastic," he added.


The “most logical” step would be to treat on-site and revive the cost-effective pipeline idea, although many municipalities are now hesitant to go that route, Narbaitz said.


“There’s fear that there may be some toxic contaminants coming from that landfill ... The possibility is there, but there’s a lot of dilution taking place.”


In her email, Turner said the city can use tanker trucks to haul leachate from the Trail Road landfill to the Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre, the city's wastewater treatment facility, if necessary. No one from the city was available for an in-person interview.


There are citizens living in the vicinity of the Trail Road landfill whose wells are still contaminated by leachate that, in the past, had seeped into the groundwater, says Ottawa riverkeeper Meredith Brown.


Historically, the city has responded to concerns about leachate only because they’re mandated to do so by the Ministry of the Environment, says Brown, whose organization advocates on behalf of the Ottawa River.


“They’re dealing with it because the province makes them deal with it, essentially,” said Brown. “They have no choice. They’re not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.”


View the original article here

Friday, April 29, 2011

Coal-ash landfill vote draws protest - Las Vegas Review - Journal

 Jason Bean/Las Vegas Review-Journal

Kenton Lee talks at an Earth Day rally Friday about health problems he blames on operations at the Reid Gardner coal-fired power plant. He is joined by other Moapa Pauites and Sierra Club members during the 6 p.m. rally outside the Southern Nevada Health District office on Shadow Lane




>
>


In a rally to commemorate Earth Day, about 25 environmentalists and members of the Moapa Band of Paiutes gathered outside Southern Nevada Health District offices Friday to protest the board's previous approval of an application to expand a coal-ash landfill near the tribe's reservation.


They said they want the health district board to rescind its Oct. 28 action and deny NV Energy a permit to expand its landfill at the Reid Gardner Generating Station, 50 miles northeast of Las Vegas, when the board meets Thursday. The existing landfill is 91 acres and has no barrier to keep contaminants from leaching into groundwater. The expansion would be 24 acres and have a single-layer barrier against leaching.


At the rally, Southern Paiutes said they continue to experience respiratory problems and other health effects from coal-ash dust that blows on windy days from the plant's existing landfill and evaporation pond operations. They also fear long-term pollution of groundwater that feeds the Muddy River.


"It smells like rotten eggs," said 21-year-old Ashly Osborne, holding a sign: "Big Coal and Big Oil Make Us Sick," as she stood in front of the health district building on Shadow Lane.


Another woman complained of the rotten-egg smell from hydrogen sulfide gas that emanates from the ponds. It stems from a liquid used to extract an air pollutant, sulfur dioxide, from the plant's stack.


"Our great-grandchildren will be affected by this," said Eunice Ohte.


In a telephone interview from the Western Environmental Law Center in Eugene, Ore., attorney Daniel Galpern said, "We are requesting that the board revisit its initial decision (to expand the landfill) in light of the fact that they were under a misunderstanding about the evidence regarding the risk of the landfill."


Galpern, representing the Sierra Club, said the board was misled by NV Energy's claim that toxic leachate from the landfill would be insignificant when the board voted 8-4 to approve the company's application.


Some information wasn't available at the time of the vote, and computer modeling of plant's existing and proposed landfill shows the amount of contamination that could be released is substantial, he wrote in a letter Wednesday to board Chairwoman Linda Strickland. Millions of gallons of leachate per year could enter groundwater, the Muddy River and eventually Lake Mead, Southern Nevada's primary drinking water supply.


NV Energy released a statement Friday saying its coal-fired Reid Gardner Generating Station "maintains a fully-compliant" landfill.


The statement from NV Energy spokeswoman Jennifer Schuricht notes that expansion of the Class III industrial waste storage area was granted last year and next week the health district staff will update the board "and detail the operating conditions and requirements to be implemented by NV Energy for this expansion."


In a letter Tuesday to the health district and board members, Galpern said a review of reports the company provided after the October vote with data plugged into a hydrologic computer model "clearly establish that substantial -- indeed, enormous -- quantities of leachate have been generated within the landfill and will continue to be generated there, and to migrate to groundwater."


"These unlawful and significant discharges may threaten vital local and regional water resources. The NV Energy-supplied information counsels you to order a full stop to development at the landfill, both present and future operations," Galpern wrote.


Coal-ash waste disposed in the landfill contains a number of harmful and toxic chemicals, according to the Sierra Club, including arsenic, selenium, lead, mercury and hexavalent chromium linked to organ disease, cancer, respiratory illness and nerve damage.


At the Oct. 28 meeting and open-house venues prior to the vote, members of the Moapa Band of Paiutes told board members and the health district's staff that the 312 Paiutes who live on the reservation have experienced a myriad of health problems that they blame on fine particulate matter from the plant and its landfill.


"You should come out and look at it on a windy day. It's killing us," Paiute Eric Lee said at a meeting in Moapa.


Others said particles sometimes come down on their homes like snowflakes.


Charles H. Norris, an expert for a geology and hydrology consulting firm in Denver, detailed the landfill's pollution potential in a 25-page report that was sent Friday to the health district board.


He found that active operations will produce 3 million to 46 million gallons per year of coal-ash leachate migration to the groundwater and the closed landfill will produce 1.2 million gallons per year of leachate that enters the groundwater during the life of a protective liner system and 1.6 million gallons per year after that.


In his report, Norris said NV Energy needs to show what impacts of the landfill expansion will be as required by Nevada law.


"Only after that is done can the board review the demonstration to determine whether the proposal will, in fact, prevent degradation of waters of the state. But, not yet. The applicant has yet to do its job," Norris wrote.


View the original article here

Review on landfill leachate treatments.: An article from: American Journal of Applied Sciences

This digital document is an article from American Journal of Applied Sciences, published by Science Publications on April 1, 2009. The length of the article is 9811 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: Key words: Landfill leachate, review, biological treatment, physical/chemical treatment, membrane filtration

Citation Details
Title: Review on landfill leachate treatments.
Author: Abdulhussain A. Abbas
Publication: American Journal of Applied Sciences (Magazine/Journal)
Date: April 1, 2009
Publisher: Science Publications
Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Page: 672(13)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning

Price: $9.95


Click here to buy from Amazon

Thursday, April 28, 2011

IL Attorney General Takes Action in Mega-Dairy Investigation - WIFR

JO DAVIESS COUNTY (WIFR) -- A six-month investigation into potential water contamination leads the Illinois Attorney General to take action against a Jo Daviess County mega-dairy.




>
>


The owner of Tradition Dairy is facing five counts, related to a silage discharge that turned part of a nearby river purple. Charges include water pollution and operating without a federal permit that allows the dairy to discharge. This issue has been at the center of neighbors' fears the 5,000-cow facility will contaminate their drinking water. Tradition Dairy now has two months to respond to the state's complaint and faces up to $250,000 in fines. Construction at the site has been at a standstill since 2008.


UPDATE: Press Release from HOMES


Illinois Attorney General Files Five-Count Suit Against Megadairy
Suit Requests IL Pollution Control Board to Assess Fines of Over $250,000


JO DAVIESS COUNTY (HOMES) -- On April 20, the Illinois Attorney General filed a five-count suit with the Illinois Pollution Control Board against the Traditions megadairy being built by A.J. Bos in Jo Daviess County, Illinois. This suit adds yet another hurdle that the California millionaire investor will have to clear before he can operate his 5,500-head dairy, which will endanger the pristine Apple River Canyon State Park and jeopardize dozens of family-owned farms.


The five counts address Clean Water Act violations, including water pollution, discharging without a permit, and discharging effluent into waters of the state. Each of the five counts carries a penalty of $50,000 per incident plus $10,000 per day, for a total fine of more than $250,000.


Local citizens, committed to protecting their clean air, safe well water, and rural communities, have fought this facility since the California investor requested a permit in December of 2007.


The suit also asks the court to require the megadairy to apply for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) permit. The IEPA would administer this application process, which could require extensive studies and a public hearing in Jo Daviess County. At that hearing, the public and experts can present evidence that this facility will damage the ecology of the Apple River, threaten endangered species, pollute local streams, and negatively affect the economy of the region, including existing family-owned dairies.


“The county board voted 11-to-5 to deny this facility a permit due to pollution concerns,” said Matthew Alschuler, press agent for HOMES. “These concerns were ignored by the Department of Agriculture when they erroneously issued a construction permit. Now the residents of Jo Daviess County will finally have their voices heard by a state agency.”


Bruce Yurdin, field operations manager for the IEPA, has previously stated that their agency would require some sort of karst testing on site before issuing an NPDES permit to the megadairy. State law has specific requirements that must be followed when building waste treatment ponds over fractured karst bedrock. These laws have not been followed by this facility.


On the morning of October 1, 2010, neighbors to the megadairy were shocked that the water in the Apple River tributary, fed by the megadairy site, was dark purple. Investigators from the IEPA and US EPA arrived on scene later that day, discovered that the megadairy leachate pond was purple, and documented purple biologically active silage leachate pooled on saturated ground. They interviewed a contractor for the megadairy who admitted to applying 320,000 gallons of purple leachate to five acres of land, an application rate about 20 times the customary level. Both environmental agencies took water samples from the purple stream and the purple leachate pond. On October 8, 2010, the IEPA referred the case to the IL Attorney General for enforcement.


A copy of the complaint can be downloaded from the IPCB site:


A press release from the IL Attorney General can be read at:


For more information about HOMES and to help support our cause, visit:


HOMES (Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards) is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt, pro-agriculture group of farmers and citizens dedicated to protecting family farms, rural communities, human health, and the environment by promoting sustainable agriculture and conserving our natural resources.

Posted by: Same Ol' Song & Dance Location: Illinois on Apr 21, 2011 at 06:36 AM
Sam ol song and dance slap on the wrist !

View the original article here

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Man sues over FMD burial site management - The Korea Herald

A real estate owner near a burial site for cattle culled to prevent the further spread of foot-and-mouth-disease filed suit against the government Saturday over environmental damage he said the slaughter and burial have caused.

The suit makes him the first person to file for compensation over the FMD measures but observers expect more to follow as the weather grows warmer and decomposition speeds up.


According to the Seoul Central District Court, the case was filed by a man identified by the surname Lee, asking the Paju government in northern Gyeonggi Province to pay him 300 million won ($270,000) in compensation for burying 10 to 15 dead animals in his soil without his consent in December, when the FMD was spreading and slaughtering the animals was considered the best preventative measure by authorities.


“The land was severely polluted with leachate and stench. Experts said I will not be able to cultivate there and the surrounding area for the next 10 to 15 years. This is a clear violation of private property,” Lee said in his complaint.


Observers forecast that more people could ask for the state compensation over the side effects of the “hastily” implemented burials amid cold weather from November to February. Authorities estimate that more than 3.5 million cows, hogs, goats, deer and other animals have been culled and buried at more than 4,000 sites nationwide.


Conventionally, animals are killed before disposal, but since the outbreak spread so quickly authorities admitted that they failed to follow slaughtering rules.


They later said that more than 1.4 million pigs and cows may have been buried alive throughout the country. They were dumped in a 5-meter-deep pit lined with double-folded vinyl, which could easily have been torn since the animals were buried alive.


Public concerns were escalating over possible biological contamination.


The Environment Ministry repaired hundreds of burial sites near water sources and residential areas after surveys showed that 143 out of 3,000 sampled underground water sources within a 300-meter radius of animal burial sites across the nation had high rates of bacteriological contamination beyond state standards.




>
>


Still, residents at Paju reported tap water to be contaminated with blood and claimed it to be related to late last year when nearly 1,000 hogs were buried alive. Some others reported extreme odor from the sites stemming from the decomposition process. 


By Bae Ji-sook (baejisook@heraldm.com)


View the original article here

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Mary Lou Sharon: Naugatuck's Earth Day Mayor for the Day - Patch.com

It all started with a mother wanting to protect her child.

Mary Lou Sharon noticed late one night as she rocked her baby girl to sleep, that dump trucks were going up and down her road on Lewis Street towards the Laurel Park landfill. The year was 1967.

Having recently heard a news report on illegal dumping in another town, she wondered if this could be the case right here in Naugatuck.

Sharon reached out to her neighbors who told stories of fires, strong chemical odors and water contamination.
Sharon’s efforts in Naugatuck were recognized Thursday when she was honored as Earth Day Mayor for the Day. A ceremony was held at Town Hall, commemorating all she has done environmentally throughout the borough.

In the Superfund 25th Anniversary Report — a federal program focused on cleaning up the nation’s hazardous waste sites — she stated: “While I was surveying the neighbors, I found many women experienced miscarriages, and cancer in many families. Young women died early in life because they used to play in the stream that was polluted. A woman bathed in benzene-contaminated water and ended up with eye tumors. Farmers’ chickens and ducks also died from the stream.”

Shocked to find the administration at the time was unresponsive to her fears and those of her neighbors, this soft-spoken, non-confrontational woman decided she would lead the charge to find the truth and most importantly, the solution.

“I started to investigate, ask questions, talk to neighbors, ask my husband questions, ask residents who worked in town,” Sharon said. “And when I heard about the trucks carrying barrels escorted and transported to the landfill and the stories about those barrels being pushed into pits and the kids watching them disintegrate, then I saw pictures of homes at the top, enveloped in smoke from the Laurel Park landfill.”

What she uncovered was that not only were chemicals being dumped in the landfill but also that they had contaminated the aquifers that feed the groundwater supply.

The neighborhood near the landfill was experiencing noxious odors from the chemicals and the resulting fires. Orange leachate oozed into backyards. A nearby brook, which flowed beneath the landfill, was heavily polluted with high levels of toxic chemicals and landfill leachate, which traveled downhill through the area of Andrew Avenue School.

When Mayor Terry Buckmiller was elected, he promptly met with the neighbors and for the first time, they had an advocate in the mayor’s office.

“This began my journey, which took 16 years from the bottom of the hill to reach the top,” she said.
In 1981, Sharon formed The Pollution Extermination Group (PEG) and by 1983 PEG was incorporated with three other members. With Sharon at the helm, PEG secured legal representation and lobbied in Washington for the re-authorization of Superfund.

They achieved their objectives, to close Laurel Park Landfill and to secure potable water for the approximately 50 residents within the ¼-mile radius of the site.

“The Connecticut Fund for the Environment playes a big part in helping us organize and become an intervening party in the state procedures,” Sharon said.

On a global level, in 1991, Sharon was one of 14 women in North America invited to speak at the Global Assembly of Women and the Environment located in Miami, Fla. Her efforts to contain contaminates at Laurel Park landfill are published in the French daily publication L’Express International.

In this region and statewide, she has been involved with a long list of conferences and task forces as well as the Northeast Earth Day Regional Organizer Network (NEDRON) and The Center for Health, Environment and Justice headed by Lois Gibbs who exposed the fact that a company in Niagra Falls, N.Y., buried 21,000 tons of toxic waste under the Love Canal neighborhood.

Laurel Park Landfill together with Sharon’s efforts has been the subject of several television documentaries and publications, including Northwest Hills, Amicus Journal and Connecticut Magazine.

In Naugatuck, she has been co-chair of Earth Day Activities, President of Pollution Extermination Group, Inc (PEG) and President of Church Woman United Community advisory panel.

For many, Sharon has been a guidepost by which they (the members of those groups) aspire to.
Len Yannelli, outreach director of the Committee for a Cultural/Environmental Center – Gunntown Road, recalls the first Naugatuck Town Meeting he attended in 1981. He stated that Sharon was constantly interrupted and her every word jeered at by an organized group in the audience.

“I was amazed at her steadfastness, calm, informed presentation and courage,” Yanelli said.
Kevin Zak, of the Naugatuck River Revival Group, said the following: “Every thing needs to start somewhere. Mary Lou started it here in our hometown. She stirred the pot and opened the door not unlike Rosa Parks. I stepped through the door she and others left open. Her story and persistence is inspirational. When we are long past, she will be remembered. I hope the youth of this town understand and are inspired by her past actions.”


View the original article here

Monday, April 25, 2011

Park area to shut over landfill leachate problem - BBC News

21 April 2011 Last updated at 13:05  Some 22 acres of the 400-acre park will be affected Part of Wrexham's largest country park will have to close after pollutants were found leaking from a former landfill site.
It makes up about 5% of Alyn Waters Country Park and was capped in 2001 but there is now evidence of leaching.
Wrexham council has warned residents the work could take two to three years to complete but said there is no risk to public or wildlife.
The eventual re-capping could cost up to £10m.
But if left, the council fears contamination of the River Alyn.
Tests show the cap is not working properly and rainwater is entering the site, producing higher than expected leachate levels.
The council said the leachate is removed regularly, but there is evidence it has "overtopped" into surrounding land at least once.
Continue reading the main story
We appreciate that this news may cause concern to those living close to the park and regular visitors”
End Quote Sarah Evans Wrexham council Of several options presented to the local authority's executive board, it decided the only "long-term sustainable solution" was to re-cap the site, which could cost between £1m-£10m.
Work will involve re-shaping the site to shed water more effectively, and installing a "geosynthetic capping layer over the existing clay".
The site - about 22 of approximately 400 acres - will be closed to the public, but the remainder will stay open.
Wrexham council said residents nearby had been informed by letter and liaison meetings will be held.
Sarah Evans, principal environment protection manager, said: "We appreciate that this news may cause concern to those living close to the park and regular visitors.
"We have undertaken to keep them informed and up to date as work progresses.
"We will also work closely with colleagues in the environment department and external advisors to safeguard the ecology of the area and to ensure the site is returned to its former state."
A contractor is now being sought.
View the original article here

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Woes pile up near dumping yard - Times of India

The GHMC has been dumping about 3,800 metric tonnes (MTs) of garbage daily in the 750-acre dump yard located about 35 kms from the city for the past few years.


Many villages like Haridaspally, Dammaiguda, Nagaram, which are located close to Jawaharnagar dump yard, have been facing ground water pollution due to continuous dumping over the years.




>
>


A few months ago, residents of Cheryala village in Keesara mandal had complained to Lokayukta that the lake in their village `Pedda Chervu' was getting polluted due to the leachate of Jawaharnagar.


Officials said Pedda Chervu is located in the downstream of Malkapur tank, which is close to Jawaharnagar. As leachate of Jawaharnagar was polluting Malkapur tank, water flowing into Pedda Chervu is also getting polluted.


After people complained of water pollution, the GHMC officials, a couple of months ago, had stopped inflows into Pedda Chervu by forming an earthen bund below the Jawaharnagar dump yard to ensure that the leachate does not enter the Malkapur tank.


Since the Pedda Chervu water had already got polluted, the Lokayukta has directed the GHMC to drain out water from the lake. Now, this has become a herculean task for the corporation officials as the tank is under the control of the minor irrigation department. GHMC officials approached the irrigation officials, who in turn sought instructions from the Ranga Reddy district collector.


The district collector did not give permission reportedly due to resentment from other villagers of Rampally, Kundapally and Godumpally, who are down streams of Pedda Chervu. The villagers expressed fear that the drained out lake water from Pedda Chervu might enter their lakes and tanks.


The water pollution in and around Jawaharnagar triggered huge protests three years ago. Villagers of Haridaspally and other villages had staged a dharna and even stopped garbage vehicles proceeding to Jawaharnagar as the dumping yard was not only causing ground water pollution but also roads were getting damaged due to heavy traffic. The GHMC assured them of laying roads, drinking water supply and street lights and other facilities.


While the roads and other facilities were provided, the GHMC recently paid about Rs 2.45 crore to the Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board to supply piped water to the villages of Dammaiguda, Nagaram, Haridaspally, Ahmedguda and Cheriyal apart from Jawaharnagar.


When contacted, GHMC executive engineer D Sudhakar said they have inspected the area on the directions of the Lokayukta and were taking necessary steps for preventing water pollution.


View the original article here

Friday, April 15, 2011

Poisons contributed by leachate from Malaysian landfills - Waste Management World

WHILE Malaysians are busy worrying about whether radiation-contaminated seawater surrounding Japan's nuclear disaster zone is going to wash onto Malaysian shores, or whether radiation-contaminated food from Japan is going to get past Customs inspections and be consumed by unsuspecting foodies, the fact is, the health of Malaysians have long been at risk of contamination by poisons contributed by leachate from our own landfills.


The poisons, including heavy metals like mercury, leach into groundwater and flow into our rivers, contaminating riverwater and the eco-system that depends on it. If the leach goes undetected, the poisons will flow into our body through the water, fish and shellfish that we consume.


Who is responsible for this insidious poisoning of the people? We are.


Every person who has ever thrown a dry cell battery (like the ones used in torchlights and television remote controls), a fluorescent tube, handphone batteries and other hazardous e-waste like computers, televisions and printers into their household dustbin has contributed to this potential poisoning of the people. Broken or crushed fluorescent tubes leak out mercury gas; dry cells leak out heavy metals. This e-waste, which is scheduled waste, cannot be thrown into an ordinary dustbin, cannot be picked up by an ordinary rubbish-collection lorry, and should not end up on a normal rubbish heap at a normal landfill which is not equipped to deal with leachate.


And yet, every day, more than 42 tonnes of such hazardous e-waste is thrown out together with ordinary household waste.


It is not enough for consumers to know their rights; they must also take responsibility for what they consume, and this includes how they dispose of what they have consumed. But it is one thing to educate the consumer about separating their rubbish; it is another thing altogether to make sure that the rubbish stays separated. Besides building more sanitary landfills with leachate treatment facilities, the government needs to set laws which require e-waste to be compulsorily recycled.


In June 1998, the Japanese government enacted a Home Appliance Recycling Law, in which all white goods were required to be cannibalised and their components recycled. The responsibility for this is borne by the consumer, who pays a compulsory up-front collection charge at the time of purchase, and the manufacturer, who must collect the used product later in the future and recycle it. No government subsidy is involved, as the role of the government is to provide direction to the public to take responsibility for their consumer habits.


Since Malaysia intends to make separation of rubbish at the source for household goods compulsory in 2013, it is only fair that this should be followed through with a plan for how to keep this waste separate.


View the original article here

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Narela-Bawana first Delhi landfill site to prevent leachate from leaching down

Narela-Bawana to be the first scientific landfill site in Delhi - Times Of India

NEW DELHI: With the three existing landfill sites oversaturated, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) is going to make its Narela-Bawana landfill site operational from next month. This is the first scientific landfill site in the city where close to 1,300 metric tonnes of solid waste will be segregated and processed to obtain refuse derived fuel (RDF) for industrial use, manure, recyclable material etc.


This is likely to bring down the burden on the three sites Ghazipur, Okhla and Bhalswa which have more than 30-metre-high piles of garbage as against the permissible limit of 20 metres. The site will be used to process garbage collected from Rohini and Civil Line zones. "It is an important project and will be completed in two phases. In the first phase, we are going to scientifically dispose of the solid waste and in the next phase, we will convert the garbage dumped at the site into energy. Only 25% of the total garbage collected will be dumped at the site. The rest will be processed," said Deep Mathur, director, press and information, MCD.

Built at a cost of Rs 70 crore, the site will have facilities for material recovery, treating leachate (toxic water discharged from garbage during decomposing), trapping harmful gases and make RDF. The leachate will be collected and treated before being released in the storm water drains. "The solid waste will be first segregated and all the recyclable material will be extracted. Bio-degradable materials will be sent to the composting plant. Others will be used to produce RDF. All the waste from these processes will be dumped at the site. The RDF produced from the site can be used by industries," said a senior MCD official.

None of the landfill sites now has a mechanism to prevent toxics from seeping into the soil, thereby polluting the ground water. "But at the Narela-Bawana site, we put up a thick liner to prevent leachate from leaching down. The landfill will be lined with two layers of clay and a high-density polythene layer in between," said an official. There is also a provision to trap the harmful gases released into the atmosphere during decomposition. "There is a mechanism in place to collect the harmful gases and flare it before releasing in the atmosphere. This will bring down air pollution level near the site," the official said.


View the original article here