Monday, July 25, 2011

Post-closure landfill costs projected at almost $300,000 - Crossville Chronicle

CROSSVILLE — Commissioners on the budget committee had to readjust sanitation fund budget figures by nearly $300,000 to allow for post-closure landfill costs.

"After we got everything done we realized we hadn't allowed for costs associated with the post-closure landfill costs. The finance office always has been allowed some leeway and authority in adjusting numbers on the budget by the committee. What we did in order to balance those anticipated costs was move 1.5 cents from debt service over to the sanitation fund," said Cumberland County Finance Director Nathan Brock.

Mike Harvel, 7th District commissioner, who also works in the county's solid waste department, said he amended the sanitation fund budget to allow more revenue for the fund by decreasing projected leachate costs from $300,000 to $200,000 and costs for recycling bins of $8,500.

"Since it (the landfill) is closed we won't have as much costs with the leachate as we had before. So that should save at least $100,000," Harvel said.

Brock said, "It's of course up to the committee, but this was the easiest way to adjust this. The tax-rate remains the same and we just moved the 1.5 cent to make the adjustment for the figures to match the projected numbers," Brock said.

With the adjustment, the projected fund balance for the sanitation fund would be $294,639.

"How do you feel about the fund balance? Could we make it a half-cent less? I'd like to see more go back to debt service. Once it's there it won't go back," 9th District Commissioner and Budget Committee Chairman Carmin Lynch said.

"I don't mind. It's up to Nathan (Brock). He pays the bills. I feel fine about it. This budget's cut to the bone. We may have to come back later in the year and adjust it again. I don't know," Harvel said.

"How does the committee feel?" Lynch asked.

Harry Sabine, 1st District commissioner then made a motion to leave the adjustment alone as it is the way the finance department adjusted the sanitation fund and draw down the fund balance on the sanitation fund if necessary later in the year. Sonya Rimmer, 8th District commissioner, supported the motion.

It was unanimously approved.

Commissioners and committee members Johnny Presley, 3rd District, and Charles Seiber, 4th District, did not attend the meeting.

With the adjustment, the breakdown of the 2011-'12 tax rate of $1.425 will be:

General Fund — 55 cents

Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund — 14 cents

General Purpose School Fund — 56.5 cents

General Debt Service — 17 cents


View the original article here

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Waste firm Biffa hit with £27000 fine for stench at Wearside rubbish dump - Sunderland Echo

 Joyce Dixon of Friends of Houghton.

A WASTE management company has been fined £27,000 after residents kicked up a stink about smells from a rubbish dump.




>
>


Houghton residents complained to the Environment Agency (EA) about the landfill site.


Inspectors visited the dump in Houghton Quarry, which was twice found to be smelling so badly that it was breaking the law.


Owner Biffa admitted two offences under the Environmental Planning Regulations Act at Sunderland Magistrates’ Court.


Prosecuting for the EA, Paul Harley said inspector Gary Wallace visited the tip on February 7 last year.


He found a large pile of uncovered waste which had a foul-smelling liquid – known as leachate – running from it.


On March 2, inspector Alice Evans was called out to investigate a smell of rotten eggs in Cathedral View. Residents complained it was “pungent, gassy and a strong rotten stench”.


However she did not visit the landfill site, as it was about 9pm.


Defending, Ray Clarke called the two incidents “isolated lapses”.


He said: “Biffa would like to apologise for these regrettable incidents.


“We regret the circumstances which led to the prosecution and would like to apologise to the court, the regulator and the individuals who were affected on these particular days.”


A further three charges were dropped by the EA.


Magistrates fined Biffa £15,000 for the first offence and £12,000 for the second.


Costs of £8,250 were also ordered.


Joyce Dixon, 86, from Newbottle, a member of pressure group Residents Against Toxic Site, sat through the hearing.


Afterwards she said: “We have suffered throughout the years and it has been hell.


“We are happy that they have been brought to court.”


In a statement, Buckinghamshire-based Biffa, said: “Biffa is committed to operating all waste facilities to high standards in order to ensure the continued protection of the environment and therefore apologies for the situation which led to this prosecution.


“In addition Biffa has worked hard to rectify the situation.


“Throughout investigations, it co-operated fully with the Environment Agency and a new site management team has undertaken a series of engineering works.


“This has included the installation of further has control pipe work and site capping work in order to prevent a reoccurrence.


“The company is also working closely with its regulators and hopes to liaise more closely with key stakeholders in the community to further improve relationships.”


View the original article here

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Investigation Reveals Potential Public Health Hazard - WVNS-TV

CHARLESTON -- Scientists call it "leachate." Trash haulers call it "compacter juice." It's the awful stuff that trickles, oozes and splashes out the back of the trucks that haul your garbage.

No question it's dirty. But our news department wondered if it was also dangerous.



>
>

(The video above is not related to the article but we thought it might interest you.)

So we had it tested. What we found shocked the seasoned experts we consulted. And it may mean the street where you live has a lot more in common with an open sewer in a Third World country than you ever imagined.

We followed compactor trucks on three separate days in different parts of Charleston, watching them crush trash and squeeze out smelly trails and pools of liquid on dozens of streets. It quickly became clear the cloudy fluid was pouring out into puddles or being drizzled in looping arcs up one street and down another.

But is it dangerous?

We took samples from a random truck on a random day. Not a scientific study, but a kind of snapshot of the contamination draining onto the streets from city garbage trucks.

"When I first saw the results for the fecal coliform, for the E. coli, I was pretty shocked at the large amount of bacteria found in the leachate," said Anita Ray, Environmental Health Director at the Kanawha-Charleston Health Department. "I am not used to seeing counts that high in things that we would routinely sample, such as outflow from a malfunctioning sewage system."

That's right. Contamination levels in the liquid are so high the only thing to compare it to is untreated sewage.

"Quite obviously," said Ray, "from the lab results that you have pulled just from this one snapshot in time, it indicates there is a pretty high potential for a public health hazard."

The bacteria E. Coli can make you extremely sick, or even kill you. It's also used as an indicator of other dangerous microorganisms. It's so dangerous, levels of E. coli in treated wastewater, for instance, can't be more than a few hundred when it's poured into the Kanawha River (depending on the number of tests). But one leachate sample we took spewing from the back of a garbage truck came back with a reading well over 4,000,000. Another was 16,000,000. And a third pegged the meter. All the lab could determine was that it was above 60,000,000.

That's why Ray calls these puddles and wet trails on your streets a potential public health hazard. Even after it dries, it's picked up on shoes, stroller wheels, anything.

"The worst case scenario, as I've said before," Ray said, "is if you have a child that has a ball or something and runs through the street, the object runs through this stuff and then the child contacts it with their hands, then puts their hand in their mouth or whatever, you've got a real potential for a transfer of that E. coli into the child's system."

How does Ray account for readings that high?

"If I might speculate, which I don't like to do ordinarily," Ray offered, "it could also be because the trucks -- and I have no idea of knowing this -- may not be cleaned out on a daily basis, and that may be showing up as a accumulative residue, if you will, of that bacteria along with the day's collection."

In other words, an unwashed truck could wind up being a big Petri dish, collecting and growing bacteria over time, and then spewing it out onto your street for your kids to play in and your dog to track into the house. And maybe make you very sick.

You can find a copy of our lab results here.

In the second part of this Hometown Investigation, we'll look under Charleston garbage trucks to figure out why so many leave wet trails of dangerous leachate behind, and we'll reveal the $10 fix for the problem.


View the original article here

Friday, July 01, 2011

How to Manage Food Waste - Alternatives to Landfill Where it Adds to Leachate Production - Natural Resources Defense Council (blog)

Food waste is approximately 14% of the household waste we discard. Food waste is of concern to environmental agencies and municipalities because in landfills food waste is a primary cause of methane gas emissions, a very potent greenhouse gas, and the methanogens that food waste supports in landfills also cause the mobilization of other pollutants in landfills, resulting in an increase in both air pollutants and leachate.




>
>


In waste combustors, food waste is a cause of nitrogen oxide emissions, which is also a greenhouse gas, as well as a cause of smog and respiratory illness. Moreover, since food waste can contain as much as 70% water, it is not a high Btu fuel, and therefore is not well-suited for combustion. The best disposal option for food waste is neither landfilling nor incineration. Ideally, food waste should be composted. If you have a compost bin where you live, you can incorporate food waste into your home compost – if not, consider setting up a home compost system. Home composting avoids transportation of organic wastes, saving fuel and other resources associated with transporting waste. There are many resources describing the options for home composting, including http://www.stopwaste.org/home/index.asp?page=441 – these range from backyard bins to vermicompost (worm bins), and can be tailored to fit your needs. In some communities (such as San Francisco), food waste is collected in curbside recycling programs, usually along with yard waste. Typically, in a municipal composting system, you can compost a wider variety of wastes (including animal products and food-soiled paper) than you might be able to accommodate in home composting. Check with your local waste management authority to find options for the disposal of food and yard wastes in your community.


If you don’t have access to composting, you can dispose of most food waste in under-sink food waste disposers, also known as garbage disposals. Many municipal wastewater treatment facilities have anaerobic digesters that extract energy in the form of biogas from solids in the waste water, and most can produce soil amendments such as fertilizer from processed solids. Some wastewater treatment systems benefit from the addition of food solids, because that can make the process of converting waste into energy more efficient, but too much or the wrong types of food waste can overwhelm the system. This is one of the reasons it makes sense to use in-sink disposers as a complement to municipal and backyard composting programs. Moreover, in-sink food disposal systems increase the amount of water used at home. Although this increase is only a small amount for any individual home, the added water from tens of thousands of homes switching to in-sink disposal units can be significant. Finally, cooking oils, fats, and greases should never be disposed of down the drain. Even if you use hot water, detergents, or garbage disposals, oils can congeal in pipes and potentially contribute to sewage backups.


To sum up, food scraps should not be sent to landfills or incinerators. Instead, the best option for disposing of food waste is composting, whether at home or in a municipal system. The next best option is typically an in-sink waste disposer – but check to make sure your community isn’t running low on water before using garbage disposals, and make sure only to put allowed wastes down the drain.


View the original article here

Monday, June 20, 2011

Garbage in Hyderabad sold out - Deccan Chronicle

June 1: As cities grow and create more garbage, disposal of the waste has become a big problem for municipal corporations around the country, including the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. So the trend to generate power from garbage, thus keeping cities clean, saving municipal bodies money, and increasing power capacity in a power-hungry city, can only be welcomed.




>
>


The waste to electricity project will mean a saving of nearly Rs 200 crore per annum for the GHMC, the amount it spends on collection, transportation, dumping and disposal of 3,500 metric tonnes of garbage generated every day in the city, which will now be done by private operators. The privately owned waste-to-energy plants will make money by converting the municipal solid waste into useful energy (electricity). GHMC has signed an agreement to supply 700 metric tonnes of garbage to Selco power plant at Shadnagar, another 700 metric tonnes per day to RDF Power Plant at Bibinagar, 700 metric tonnes to Sri Venkateshwara Green Power Project Ltd. at Ibrahimpatnam and the remaining to Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. at Jawaharnagar. What’s more, the Tata Power Trading Company, a giant in the private power sector, has come forward to purchase the power generated by RDF and Sri Venkateshwara power plants. Selco already has an agreement with APTransco, and Ramky is all set to finalise its power purchase agreement with a private company. Urban development experts and environmentalists have welcomed the waste to energy route for garbage disposal. As private companies stand to make crores of rupees, they will ensure that no garbage is left on the streets, and that it is collected and supplied to them for production of power every day.


Eminent environmentalist Mr K. Purushotham Reddy said: “The sate government should set up a mechanism to monitor that the remains of the garbage, after energy is produced, is disposed off in a scientific manner. Let’s hope the private garbage power plants project is successful and Greater Hyderabad becomes a more eco-friendly city.” Venkateshwara Projects will take 700 metric tonnes of garbage daily from GHMC and produce nearly 2 lakh power units per day, according to its executive director Mr N.S.R. Naidu. The 12 MW garbage power plant of Venkateshwara will be operational soon.


The 11 MW waste-to-energy plant of RDF Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. at Bibinagar has already signed a power purchase agreement with Tata Power, which will buy power at Rs 3.60 per unit. The plant will produce 2 lakh units of power every day. The SELCO power plant at Shadnagar and Sriram Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd. at Vijayawada, were the first in the country to start producing power out of garbage. They have a long-term agreement with APTransco to purchase power from them.


In fact, all metropolitan cities are now promoting garbage power plants as not only a solution to dispose of garbage in an environmentally sound way but also to turn a profit while doing so.


Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd.’s project director, Ms Padmaja, said that the company’s Rs 897 crore integrated solid waste management project in Greater Hyderabad will not only set up the garbage power plant but also establish a sorting plant, compost units and leachate sumps at the Jawaharnagar dumping yard.


These three main components of the project will gradually put an end to air and ground water pollution besides allowing the segregation of garbage at the dumping yard if not at the doorsteps of citizens. Leachate sumps will suck the liquid from the garbage while the sorting plant will segregate materials that are harmful to the environment and those that can be sent for recycling or to compost units. The GHMC additional commissioner, health and sanitation, Mr S.K. Aleem Basha, said the demand for supply of garbage to the private power plants is increasing. “All the agreements are in place for supply of 3,500 metric tonnes of garbage to the power plants. One power plant has recently urged us to increase their quota from 700 metric tonnes to 1,000 metric tonnes of garbage per day,” he said.


View the original article here

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Plant to accept more leachate - Waste Management World

BUCHANAN - The wastewater treatment plant in Buchanan will accept up to three times the amount of leachate that it now takes in from the Southeast Berrien County Landfill.


It's a move that will save the landfill $250,000 per year and generate about $50,000 annually for the city, Buchanan City Manager William Marx said.


Leachate is water after it drains through the landfilled trash and collects at the bottom of the dump. It contains a variety of chemicals and other matter from contact with the refuse.


"This is quite a savings for the landfill. We have the ability to take this," said Buchanan Mayor Carla Cole, who's also a member of the Southeast Berrien County Landfill Authority board.


Under an agreement drafted in 1984, Marx said the city's wastewater treatment plant has taken up to 25,000 gallons of leachate per day from the landfill.


Additional leachate from the landfill has been shipped by tanker to a treatment plant in Elkhart at a much higher cost because of transportation costs.


Marx said he recently had lunch with landfill general manager Sonny Fuller and listened to his desire to reduce the expense of shipping leachate.


Marx said he began checking with operators at the wastewater plant and learned as much as 100,000 gallons of leachate per day can easily be safely treated at the plant.


The Buchanan City Commissioners unanimously voted in favor of an agreement this week that allows the landfill to transport additional leachate to the plant through an existing pipeline.


Marx said the move has been approved by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.


He said the landfill will have to perform some upgrades to its lift station to increase the flows.


Commissioner Dave Hagey applauded what he said he felt was a sample of the creative solutions ordinary citizens don't realize are occurring in local government.


"These are the kind of things percolating below the surface that people don't understand," Hagey said.


Cole said transporting leachate by tanker costs the landfill $115 per hour.


"This is where our biggest savings is going to be," the mayor said.


View the original article here

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Unlocking energy from our fetid garbage tombs - CTV.ca

ANH CHU - The Globe and Mail

In Calgary's Shepard landfill, the seagulls squawk like a dissenting mob amid the drone of heavy machinery flattening trash. But one hectare of land sits with no apparent activity above ground. Below the surface lies the potential to transform the way cities manage their solid waste.

This site is home to the Biocell, a pilot project whose premise – garbage as a renewable resource – sounds more like wishful thinking than reality.

“Landfills are garbage graveyards, or perpetual storage,” says Patrick Hettiaratchi, biocell research lead at the University of Calgary's Schulich School of Engineering. Unexpected finds have been unearthed from old landfills, where even organic waste such as yard clippings and kitchen scraps are slow to biodegrade in the dry, tomb-like conditions.

“It's quite easy to read a newspaper from the 1970s,” says Corey Colbran, landfill operations leader at the City of Calgary.

Conventional sanitary landfills try to minimize the two common hazards of trash: leachate (toxic garbage juice) and methane (a major contributor to greenhouse gases). The biocell is a sustainable, closed-loop system in which the negative byproducts of garbage become advantages.

Leachate is collected at the bottom of the cell and recirculated through a network of pipes – meaning the toxic soup doesn't need to burden wastewater treatment plants. The moisture from the leachate speeds up the degradation of the garbage, and because no oxygen is present, the anaerobic environment accelerates the production of methane. The research team at the Schulich School of Engineering is finding ways to augment the leachate to degrade tough materials.

Normally, more methane is not a desirable outcome. But within the biocell, the gas is collected and converted into electricity. From 2007 to 2009, more than 800,000 cubic metres were converted into electricity, which then helped power Calgary’s light-rail transit system.

The production of methane for electricity is not new, but the landfill biocell is unique. A two-day workshop of international engineering consultants provided the genesis for the pilot project in 2003. “People have tried gas extraction before. People have tried landfill mining. We said, ‘Why don't we combine these ideas?’” explains Dr. Hettiaratchi.

Methane production is the first of three stages. “The first stage is an anaerobic reactor, where we get the gas out. For the second stage, we put air into the system and make it aerobic, so it becomes like composting,” says Dr. Hettiaratchi. About 70 per cent of the waste in Calgary's landfills is organic.

Once methane production slows, phase two begins and air is dispersed throughout the cell to mimic the aerobic biodegradation that occurs during composting. The resulting compost-like material should be stable enough to use in the city's parks.

In the third and last phase, the area will be mined for non-biodegradable materials. “Dirty plastics could be used to manufacture things like park benches,” Dr. Hettiaratchi explains.

Calgary has about 30 to 40 years of landfill space left, and a biocell could extend that to 100 years. It would also be cost-effective. “The landfill becomes a cheap processing facility,” says Dr. Hettiaratchi. Researchers picture biocells processing landfill waste in networks of 10 cells – with eight in operation concurrently, one in the filling stage and one in the excavating stage.

The project is as collaborative as the techniques suggest. In addition to the university, the City of Calgary works with consulting engineering firm Stantec for design and construction, and CH2M Hill for operations.

The pilot has yet to be completed and its results analyzed, but the bottom line is the biocell must prove itself as a financially viable option for cities.

“The focus is on making sure all the technology works” before applying for patents for particular components, says Dr. Hettiaratchi, noting that any experiment may have unexpected results.

“Our initial research estimate, as far as construction was concerned, was that the biocell would cost 50 per cent more than the typical landfill,” he says, estimating that Calgary has spent about $2-million to $3-million so far in the biocell's construction, not including operations and management.

“Regardless of what methods a municipality chooses to manage its organic waste, there will still be landfills of some description, because some materials are just not recyclable or reusable,” says Stantec's Don Davies.

The biocell can generate energy, create compost, recover other resources and reduce the amount of leachate and greenhouse gas emissions produced, but the biggest advantage could come in a finite resource that all burgeoning cities face: space.

“Space is at a premium at landfill sites, so excavating the site is critical because you're then able to reuse that area,” says Mr. Colbran.

The biocell project has already garnered awards for innovation in engineering. If the results remain as promising as they have been in Calgary's dry and wintry climes, which prolong the process, the benefits are far-reaching. In fact, a waste management company from Mumbai has already discussed adopting the technology.

Mr. Davies speaks best to the necessity of innovative thinking when it comes to garbage: “Whether it's the biocell concept or some other method of processing organic waste, this is the future.”


View the original article here

Saturday, June 04, 2011

Judge Orders Guam EPA to Inspect Questioned Dump Sites Around Ordot Dump - Pacific News Center

Sunday, 29 May 2011 14:04 Written by Kevin Kerrigan Friday, 27 May 2011 17:54

Guam News - Guam News


Guam - At the request of  Federal receiver GBB, District Court Judge Francis Tydingco-Gatewood has ordered Guam EPA to investigate a number of dump sites within a 3 mile radius of the Ordot Dump.




>
>


In a Special Report to the Court filed Thursday, the receiver cites "several dump sites" near the Ordot Dump, and one very large one. The exact number is not stated.


Its not clear whether any of these sites are properly permitted, but the receiver notes that none of them are lined and therefore a source of leachate, "all dump sites produce leachate," states the receiver's report and leachate is "one of the principal causes of pollution from the Ordot Dump and one of the primary reasons for the Consent Decree."




>
>


Read Federal Receiver GBB's request for order


In its request for an inspection of these sites, GBB notes that the "identification of all sources of  leachate and other groundwater contamination is an important step" in the final closure of the Ordot dump which is slated to close August 31.


 


And the leachate from these other, unlined dumps, are a "potential problem for accurately understanding and mitigating the pollution coming from the Ordot Dump itself " and "potentially complicates the process for final closure of the Ordot Dump."




>
>


Read the District Court's Order


GBB requested, and the Judge agreed in an order issued Friday, to require Guam EPA to investigate all dump sites within a 3 mile radius of the Ordot Dump to determine:


1. The compliance of these dump sites with applicable Guam and federal laws and regulations;
2. The size and approximate leachate potential for each such dump site;
3. The party responsible for the site;
4. The potential of the dump site to complicate the closure of the Ordot Dump; and
5. The steps recommended or taken by GEPA to eliminate these dump sites as a source of contamination of the environment in the vicinity of the Ordot Dump.



View the original article here

Friday, June 03, 2011

State plans upgrades at closed landfill, By LAUREL BEAGER, Editor - International Falls Daily Journal

County considers transferring ownership of site to state


As the state of Minnesota prepares to spend $5.5 million to improve a closed landfill in International Falls, the question of whether Koochiching County or the state should own the property has been raised.


The landfill located in International Falls is owned by Koochiching County, but is subject to a landfill cleanup agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which holds an easement to the property and response action equipment on the property, according to Tom Newman, land manager with the Closed Landfill and Superfund programs of the Remediation Division of the MPCA.


Newman met with the county board this week to propose that the county turn total ownership of the property over to the state.


Newman told the board that the MPCA used proceeds from the sale of state general obligation bonds for capital costs of environmental response actions that the MPCA took at the landfill beginning in 2003. As a result, certain requirements on sale or other disposition of the property are imposed. To ensure that requirements of state law and the commissioner’s order are carried out, a declaration must be signed by the state and county and recorded.


Newman explained that the state is responsible for the long-term care of the landfill, but Koochiching County also has liability as the owners of the property.Newman said the transfer of ownership to the state would make his duties easier.




>
>


(Video has no connection with the article.)


Meanwhile, Newman said the MPCA is seeking bonding money this session to make improvements at the landfill site. Should the Legislature not grant the money, the MPCA would seek it the next year.


He said the $5.5 million would be used to place an impervious cover over the landfill; upgrade the system that collects water leaching from the landfill, thereby improving drainage; and increase the amount of leachate removed from the site from 6,000 gallons per day to 24,000 gallons per day. Should the leachate amount increase as expected, the state would consider installing a forced main line from thel leachate pond to the North Koochiching Sanitary Sewer District.


Commissioners asked if the county could dovetail on the state’s project should it move forward with installing a line to the sewer treatment plant by connecting nearby residences to sewer at the same time.


Newman said the county project would need to meet the time line of the state.


Commissioners asked questions about liability should the leachate “plume” move off the site toward residences.


Newman said the state accepts no liability, just responsibility.


“My job is to make sure the plume does not move off site,” he said, adding that he would guide development and the county could implement development plans to avoid installing wells nearby.


Should the plume move toward existing residences in a natural way, the state would take action to keep people safe, including installing filtration systems on wells in the area of concern.


However, he said, questions could arise should a high capacity well be installed nearby that draws the plume toward residences and contaminates wells.


A closed landfill in Northome was also discussed, and Newman said the state could provide easements for access to logging areas, but the landfill itself could not be used as a staging area for logs.


“All our concerns are about houses and development — people putting wells in,” he said.


Newman said at some point in the future, all properly closed and handled landfills can be used. However, he said it may take generations before the properties stop producing methane gas and leachate allowing for development.


He said a bill at the Legislature now would allow the state to “delist” all or portions of closed landfills that staff feel are safe for development. Now, he said, the closed landfills can not be used.


Newman was asked to research whether the state would consider a reverter clause that would provide state ownership to the property, but would revert back to county ownership at some point.
View the original article here

Monday, May 23, 2011

Landfill Taking Drilling Waste - Wheeling Intelligencer

WHEELING - With permission from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Chesapeake Energy is dumping waste at the Short Creek Landfill.

"The advantage of taking this waste to the landfills is there are protective liners in landfills and the leachate is collected and tested," said DEP spokeswoman Kathy Cosco. "This is really drilling waste, which includes drill cuttings and the drilling mud that is used in the process."

During a recent federal court hearing in a case in which Wetzel County property owners Larry and Jana Rine are suing Chesapeake for allegedly dumping benzene and radioactive material into a large hole on the Rines' property, Chesapeake attorney Timothy Miller noted Chesapeake has been taking drilling waste to the Short Creek Landfill on North Fork Road.

None of this material seems to be radioactive, however. Testifying on behalf of Chesapeake, environmental consultant Ernest Franz said a set of alarms on the sides of the landfill's entrance would sound if the truck contained radioactive material.

He said no truckloads of Chesapeake waste have been turned away from the landfill for this reason.

"Chesapeake utilizes a closed loop drilling process throughout the Marcellus (Shale). This process separates drill cuttings into steel bins that are taken off site for disposal in approved regional landfills," Chesapeake's Director of Corporate Development Stacey Brodak said when asked for further explanation of the comments from Miller and Franz.

Kosco said the DEP regulates West Virginia's landfills but does not have a specific regulation for the disposal of drilling waste. She said the drill cuttings are classified as "special waste," like gasoline contaminated waste resulting from highway accidents.

"Like when a tractor-trailer overturns and diesel fuel is spilled, the absorbent material used to clean up that spill is considered a special waste and can be taken to landfills that are permitted to accept it," she said.

Cosco said the DEP sent letters to landfills in 2009 to let them know they would need to modify their permits to accept the drilling waste. Testing for certain metals and petroleum hydrocarbons is required under the new regulations.

Dumping the waste in landfills may be a viable alternative for natural gas drillers because West Virginia's public water systems are no longer able to accept drilling waste. According to the DEP, Wheeling-based Liquid Assets Disposal allegedly dumped briny wastewater from gas drilling sites at the Center Wheeling pollution plant from January 2009 to February 2010. During this time, LAD allegedly exceeded the 9,000-pound daily chloride limitation for Wheeling's plant on about 50 occasions. This resulted in the DEP issuing a $414,000 fine against the city.

Wheeling Public Works Director Russell Jebbia has said the city will follow DEP guidelines in not accepting anymore drilling waste.


View the original article here

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Teck Metals compensates Trail, BC, for mercury spill into Columbia River - The Canadian Press

Teck Metals compensates Trail, B.C., for mercury spill into Columbia River(The Canadian Press) – 2 days ago

VANCOUVER — Teck Metals says it accepts full responsibility for a spill of mercury into the Columbia River in Trail, B.C.

The discharge occurred Oct. 7, 2010, just weeks after leachate from Teck's lead and zinc smelting operation overflowed into Stoney Creek, near the company's huge operation in southeastern B.C.

A lengthy investigation under the Fisheries Act and the Environmental Management Act ended with a series of recommendations aimed at ensuring a similar thing doesn't happen again.

The company has now agreed to pay $325,000 in compensation for the two spills.

Several community and environmental groups in the Trail area will share the cash.

Teck says it has also taken steps to avoid future incidents, including proceeding with the second phase of an $8.3-million effluent spill reduction program.

Copyright © 2011 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.


View the original article here

Friday, May 20, 2011

Portable wastewater treatment plant to treat landfill leachate in Mexico - Water World

TORONTO, ON, Canada, Apr. 26, 2011 -- Under an MOU with Hasar's Grupo Ecologico, Blue Gold Canada plans to install a wastewater treatment plant at a landfill in Guadalajara, Mexico.




>
>


The Blue Gold/Dove Biotech wastewater treatment plant will have the capacity to treat 50,000 liters of water per hour and will use a proprietary organic/natural solution called CWP-121 to remove the contamination from the leachate pools. The treated effluent will then be used for agricultural applications.


The project is scheduled to be installed later this year.


View the original article here

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Attorney General Madigan Files Complaint for Water Pollution, Discharge ... - eNews Park Forest

Thursday, 21 April 2011 09:43 Press Release Latest Local News ( 0 Votes ) Chicago--(ENEWSPF)--April 21, 2011.  Attorney General Lisa Madigan has filed a water pollution complaint against the owner of a dairy farm under construction in Jo Daviess County after a pink and purple-colored liquid flowed into the South Fork of the Apple River. It is alleged the liquid was leachate from silage stored at the facility.




>
>


(Video and article have no connection.)


Traditions South Dairy, 12504 E. Canyon Road near Stockton, is owned by A.J. Bos of Bakersfield, Calif. Bos’ Tradition Investments, LLC is named in the complaint filed yesterday with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPBC).


According to Madigan’s complaint, on Oct. 1, 2010, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) investigated a citizen complaint of discoloration in the west branch of the South Fork. Inspectors traced the color back to a location at the dairy where a field tile discharged into the tributary. Results of samples collected by the IEPA revealed, among other things, an elevated level of suspended solids attributable to the discharge of silage leachate. In addition, the unnatural color also violates state water regulations. Traditions employees told the IEPA the silage was collected at the dairy in anticipation of livestock that had yet arrived and leachate from the silage was stored in a holding pit at the dairy. The contract land applicator told inspectors he applied approximately 320,000 gallons of the silage leachate on five acres the previous day as well as Oct. 1, 2010.

Madigan’s complaint requests the IPCB to schedule a hearing in Jo Daviess County where Traditions Investments will have an opportunity to answer the five counts in the complaint that includes water pollution and operating without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. Each count seeks a civil penalty of $50,000 per violation and an additional $10,000 for each day the violation continued.

Senior Assistant Attorney General Jane McBride is handling the case for Madigan’s Environmental Bureau in Springfield.

Source: illinoisattorneygeneral.gov

View the original article here

Saturday, April 30, 2011

City commits millions to leachate management - Open File

The city is moving ahead with plans to build a leachate treatment facility at the municipally owned Trail Road landfill—more than seven years after city council first floated the idea.




>
>


Over the next three years, $9 million has been set aside to study and build the on-site facility, which will need to be operational by 2015, city spokesperson Jocelyne Turner confirmed in an email.


Landfill leachate is water, generally rain or snow, that seeps through garbage and extracts potentially harmful contaminants. It can pose serious environmental risks if it ends up in the groundwater—precisely the concern that Barrhaven residents brought to council in 2004, when the city was planning to build a pipeline under their homes that would shuttle leachate into the sewer system.


Later that year, council directed the city to study on-site leachate management as well. But the plans were shelved after a new stormwater plan at the Trail Road site, combined with a shift in the city’s overall waste management strategy, led to a significant decline in the amount of leachate being produced, said Turner.


No leachate escaped the site in 2010, she said. But current landfill usage rates mean that by 2015, the landfill cap—the impermeable barrier that separates the contaminated waste from the surface—will need to be removed to expand the site. And with the cap gone, snow and rain will collect and need to be treated, she said.


Most of the overall cost—$8 million—has been earmarked for the construction of the treatment facility in 2014. An additional $800,000 in 2012 will go towards “pretreatment” of the leachate, while the final $200,000 will be spent this year on consulting fees “to select the most effective leachate treatment” at the site, said Turner.


Although the city has not revealed what options are currently being considered, one possible idea might be to incorporate some sort of membrane bioreactor system into the facility, says Roberto Narbaitz, an engineering professor at the University of Ottawa.


Such a system would use bacteria to break down the leachate, which would then be filtered through a thin ceramic membrane, leaving hazardous solids behind, says Narbaitz. The relatively expensive technology would give citizens “bang for your buck” at the start of the process, he says. But once the contaminants are no longer biologically reducible, “it’s not so fantastic," he added.


The “most logical” step would be to treat on-site and revive the cost-effective pipeline idea, although many municipalities are now hesitant to go that route, Narbaitz said.


“There’s fear that there may be some toxic contaminants coming from that landfill ... The possibility is there, but there’s a lot of dilution taking place.”


In her email, Turner said the city can use tanker trucks to haul leachate from the Trail Road landfill to the Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre, the city's wastewater treatment facility, if necessary. No one from the city was available for an in-person interview.


There are citizens living in the vicinity of the Trail Road landfill whose wells are still contaminated by leachate that, in the past, had seeped into the groundwater, says Ottawa riverkeeper Meredith Brown.


Historically, the city has responded to concerns about leachate only because they’re mandated to do so by the Ministry of the Environment, says Brown, whose organization advocates on behalf of the Ottawa River.


“They’re dealing with it because the province makes them deal with it, essentially,” said Brown. “They have no choice. They’re not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.”


View the original article here

Friday, April 29, 2011

Coal-ash landfill vote draws protest - Las Vegas Review - Journal

 Jason Bean/Las Vegas Review-Journal

Kenton Lee talks at an Earth Day rally Friday about health problems he blames on operations at the Reid Gardner coal-fired power plant. He is joined by other Moapa Pauites and Sierra Club members during the 6 p.m. rally outside the Southern Nevada Health District office on Shadow Lane




>
>


In a rally to commemorate Earth Day, about 25 environmentalists and members of the Moapa Band of Paiutes gathered outside Southern Nevada Health District offices Friday to protest the board's previous approval of an application to expand a coal-ash landfill near the tribe's reservation.


They said they want the health district board to rescind its Oct. 28 action and deny NV Energy a permit to expand its landfill at the Reid Gardner Generating Station, 50 miles northeast of Las Vegas, when the board meets Thursday. The existing landfill is 91 acres and has no barrier to keep contaminants from leaching into groundwater. The expansion would be 24 acres and have a single-layer barrier against leaching.


At the rally, Southern Paiutes said they continue to experience respiratory problems and other health effects from coal-ash dust that blows on windy days from the plant's existing landfill and evaporation pond operations. They also fear long-term pollution of groundwater that feeds the Muddy River.


"It smells like rotten eggs," said 21-year-old Ashly Osborne, holding a sign: "Big Coal and Big Oil Make Us Sick," as she stood in front of the health district building on Shadow Lane.


Another woman complained of the rotten-egg smell from hydrogen sulfide gas that emanates from the ponds. It stems from a liquid used to extract an air pollutant, sulfur dioxide, from the plant's stack.


"Our great-grandchildren will be affected by this," said Eunice Ohte.


In a telephone interview from the Western Environmental Law Center in Eugene, Ore., attorney Daniel Galpern said, "We are requesting that the board revisit its initial decision (to expand the landfill) in light of the fact that they were under a misunderstanding about the evidence regarding the risk of the landfill."


Galpern, representing the Sierra Club, said the board was misled by NV Energy's claim that toxic leachate from the landfill would be insignificant when the board voted 8-4 to approve the company's application.


Some information wasn't available at the time of the vote, and computer modeling of plant's existing and proposed landfill shows the amount of contamination that could be released is substantial, he wrote in a letter Wednesday to board Chairwoman Linda Strickland. Millions of gallons of leachate per year could enter groundwater, the Muddy River and eventually Lake Mead, Southern Nevada's primary drinking water supply.


NV Energy released a statement Friday saying its coal-fired Reid Gardner Generating Station "maintains a fully-compliant" landfill.


The statement from NV Energy spokeswoman Jennifer Schuricht notes that expansion of the Class III industrial waste storage area was granted last year and next week the health district staff will update the board "and detail the operating conditions and requirements to be implemented by NV Energy for this expansion."


In a letter Tuesday to the health district and board members, Galpern said a review of reports the company provided after the October vote with data plugged into a hydrologic computer model "clearly establish that substantial -- indeed, enormous -- quantities of leachate have been generated within the landfill and will continue to be generated there, and to migrate to groundwater."


"These unlawful and significant discharges may threaten vital local and regional water resources. The NV Energy-supplied information counsels you to order a full stop to development at the landfill, both present and future operations," Galpern wrote.


Coal-ash waste disposed in the landfill contains a number of harmful and toxic chemicals, according to the Sierra Club, including arsenic, selenium, lead, mercury and hexavalent chromium linked to organ disease, cancer, respiratory illness and nerve damage.


At the Oct. 28 meeting and open-house venues prior to the vote, members of the Moapa Band of Paiutes told board members and the health district's staff that the 312 Paiutes who live on the reservation have experienced a myriad of health problems that they blame on fine particulate matter from the plant and its landfill.


"You should come out and look at it on a windy day. It's killing us," Paiute Eric Lee said at a meeting in Moapa.


Others said particles sometimes come down on their homes like snowflakes.


Charles H. Norris, an expert for a geology and hydrology consulting firm in Denver, detailed the landfill's pollution potential in a 25-page report that was sent Friday to the health district board.


He found that active operations will produce 3 million to 46 million gallons per year of coal-ash leachate migration to the groundwater and the closed landfill will produce 1.2 million gallons per year of leachate that enters the groundwater during the life of a protective liner system and 1.6 million gallons per year after that.


In his report, Norris said NV Energy needs to show what impacts of the landfill expansion will be as required by Nevada law.


"Only after that is done can the board review the demonstration to determine whether the proposal will, in fact, prevent degradation of waters of the state. But, not yet. The applicant has yet to do its job," Norris wrote.


View the original article here

Review on landfill leachate treatments.: An article from: American Journal of Applied Sciences

This digital document is an article from American Journal of Applied Sciences, published by Science Publications on April 1, 2009. The length of the article is 9811 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: Key words: Landfill leachate, review, biological treatment, physical/chemical treatment, membrane filtration

Citation Details
Title: Review on landfill leachate treatments.
Author: Abdulhussain A. Abbas
Publication: American Journal of Applied Sciences (Magazine/Journal)
Date: April 1, 2009
Publisher: Science Publications
Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Page: 672(13)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning

Price: $9.95


Click here to buy from Amazon

Thursday, April 28, 2011

IL Attorney General Takes Action in Mega-Dairy Investigation - WIFR

JO DAVIESS COUNTY (WIFR) -- A six-month investigation into potential water contamination leads the Illinois Attorney General to take action against a Jo Daviess County mega-dairy.




>
>


The owner of Tradition Dairy is facing five counts, related to a silage discharge that turned part of a nearby river purple. Charges include water pollution and operating without a federal permit that allows the dairy to discharge. This issue has been at the center of neighbors' fears the 5,000-cow facility will contaminate their drinking water. Tradition Dairy now has two months to respond to the state's complaint and faces up to $250,000 in fines. Construction at the site has been at a standstill since 2008.


UPDATE: Press Release from HOMES


Illinois Attorney General Files Five-Count Suit Against Megadairy
Suit Requests IL Pollution Control Board to Assess Fines of Over $250,000


JO DAVIESS COUNTY (HOMES) -- On April 20, the Illinois Attorney General filed a five-count suit with the Illinois Pollution Control Board against the Traditions megadairy being built by A.J. Bos in Jo Daviess County, Illinois. This suit adds yet another hurdle that the California millionaire investor will have to clear before he can operate his 5,500-head dairy, which will endanger the pristine Apple River Canyon State Park and jeopardize dozens of family-owned farms.


The five counts address Clean Water Act violations, including water pollution, discharging without a permit, and discharging effluent into waters of the state. Each of the five counts carries a penalty of $50,000 per incident plus $10,000 per day, for a total fine of more than $250,000.


Local citizens, committed to protecting their clean air, safe well water, and rural communities, have fought this facility since the California investor requested a permit in December of 2007.


The suit also asks the court to require the megadairy to apply for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) permit. The IEPA would administer this application process, which could require extensive studies and a public hearing in Jo Daviess County. At that hearing, the public and experts can present evidence that this facility will damage the ecology of the Apple River, threaten endangered species, pollute local streams, and negatively affect the economy of the region, including existing family-owned dairies.


“The county board voted 11-to-5 to deny this facility a permit due to pollution concerns,” said Matthew Alschuler, press agent for HOMES. “These concerns were ignored by the Department of Agriculture when they erroneously issued a construction permit. Now the residents of Jo Daviess County will finally have their voices heard by a state agency.”


Bruce Yurdin, field operations manager for the IEPA, has previously stated that their agency would require some sort of karst testing on site before issuing an NPDES permit to the megadairy. State law has specific requirements that must be followed when building waste treatment ponds over fractured karst bedrock. These laws have not been followed by this facility.


On the morning of October 1, 2010, neighbors to the megadairy were shocked that the water in the Apple River tributary, fed by the megadairy site, was dark purple. Investigators from the IEPA and US EPA arrived on scene later that day, discovered that the megadairy leachate pond was purple, and documented purple biologically active silage leachate pooled on saturated ground. They interviewed a contractor for the megadairy who admitted to applying 320,000 gallons of purple leachate to five acres of land, an application rate about 20 times the customary level. Both environmental agencies took water samples from the purple stream and the purple leachate pond. On October 8, 2010, the IEPA referred the case to the IL Attorney General for enforcement.


A copy of the complaint can be downloaded from the IPCB site:


A press release from the IL Attorney General can be read at:


For more information about HOMES and to help support our cause, visit:


HOMES (Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards) is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt, pro-agriculture group of farmers and citizens dedicated to protecting family farms, rural communities, human health, and the environment by promoting sustainable agriculture and conserving our natural resources.

Posted by: Same Ol' Song & Dance Location: Illinois on Apr 21, 2011 at 06:36 AM
Sam ol song and dance slap on the wrist !

View the original article here

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Mary Lou Sharon: Naugatuck's Earth Day Mayor for the Day - Patch.com

It all started with a mother wanting to protect her child.

Mary Lou Sharon noticed late one night as she rocked her baby girl to sleep, that dump trucks were going up and down her road on Lewis Street towards the Laurel Park landfill. The year was 1967.

Having recently heard a news report on illegal dumping in another town, she wondered if this could be the case right here in Naugatuck.

Sharon reached out to her neighbors who told stories of fires, strong chemical odors and water contamination.
Sharon’s efforts in Naugatuck were recognized Thursday when she was honored as Earth Day Mayor for the Day. A ceremony was held at Town Hall, commemorating all she has done environmentally throughout the borough.

In the Superfund 25th Anniversary Report — a federal program focused on cleaning up the nation’s hazardous waste sites — she stated: “While I was surveying the neighbors, I found many women experienced miscarriages, and cancer in many families. Young women died early in life because they used to play in the stream that was polluted. A woman bathed in benzene-contaminated water and ended up with eye tumors. Farmers’ chickens and ducks also died from the stream.”

Shocked to find the administration at the time was unresponsive to her fears and those of her neighbors, this soft-spoken, non-confrontational woman decided she would lead the charge to find the truth and most importantly, the solution.

“I started to investigate, ask questions, talk to neighbors, ask my husband questions, ask residents who worked in town,” Sharon said. “And when I heard about the trucks carrying barrels escorted and transported to the landfill and the stories about those barrels being pushed into pits and the kids watching them disintegrate, then I saw pictures of homes at the top, enveloped in smoke from the Laurel Park landfill.”

What she uncovered was that not only were chemicals being dumped in the landfill but also that they had contaminated the aquifers that feed the groundwater supply.

The neighborhood near the landfill was experiencing noxious odors from the chemicals and the resulting fires. Orange leachate oozed into backyards. A nearby brook, which flowed beneath the landfill, was heavily polluted with high levels of toxic chemicals and landfill leachate, which traveled downhill through the area of Andrew Avenue School.

When Mayor Terry Buckmiller was elected, he promptly met with the neighbors and for the first time, they had an advocate in the mayor’s office.

“This began my journey, which took 16 years from the bottom of the hill to reach the top,” she said.
In 1981, Sharon formed The Pollution Extermination Group (PEG) and by 1983 PEG was incorporated with three other members. With Sharon at the helm, PEG secured legal representation and lobbied in Washington for the re-authorization of Superfund.

They achieved their objectives, to close Laurel Park Landfill and to secure potable water for the approximately 50 residents within the ¼-mile radius of the site.

“The Connecticut Fund for the Environment playes a big part in helping us organize and become an intervening party in the state procedures,” Sharon said.

On a global level, in 1991, Sharon was one of 14 women in North America invited to speak at the Global Assembly of Women and the Environment located in Miami, Fla. Her efforts to contain contaminates at Laurel Park landfill are published in the French daily publication L’Express International.

In this region and statewide, she has been involved with a long list of conferences and task forces as well as the Northeast Earth Day Regional Organizer Network (NEDRON) and The Center for Health, Environment and Justice headed by Lois Gibbs who exposed the fact that a company in Niagra Falls, N.Y., buried 21,000 tons of toxic waste under the Love Canal neighborhood.

Laurel Park Landfill together with Sharon’s efforts has been the subject of several television documentaries and publications, including Northwest Hills, Amicus Journal and Connecticut Magazine.

In Naugatuck, she has been co-chair of Earth Day Activities, President of Pollution Extermination Group, Inc (PEG) and President of Church Woman United Community advisory panel.

For many, Sharon has been a guidepost by which they (the members of those groups) aspire to.
Len Yannelli, outreach director of the Committee for a Cultural/Environmental Center – Gunntown Road, recalls the first Naugatuck Town Meeting he attended in 1981. He stated that Sharon was constantly interrupted and her every word jeered at by an organized group in the audience.

“I was amazed at her steadfastness, calm, informed presentation and courage,” Yanelli said.
Kevin Zak, of the Naugatuck River Revival Group, said the following: “Every thing needs to start somewhere. Mary Lou started it here in our hometown. She stirred the pot and opened the door not unlike Rosa Parks. I stepped through the door she and others left open. Her story and persistence is inspirational. When we are long past, she will be remembered. I hope the youth of this town understand and are inspired by her past actions.”


View the original article here

Monday, April 25, 2011

Park area to shut over landfill leachate problem - BBC News

21 April 2011 Last updated at 13:05  Some 22 acres of the 400-acre park will be affected Part of Wrexham's largest country park will have to close after pollutants were found leaking from a former landfill site.
It makes up about 5% of Alyn Waters Country Park and was capped in 2001 but there is now evidence of leaching.
Wrexham council has warned residents the work could take two to three years to complete but said there is no risk to public or wildlife.
The eventual re-capping could cost up to £10m.
But if left, the council fears contamination of the River Alyn.
Tests show the cap is not working properly and rainwater is entering the site, producing higher than expected leachate levels.
The council said the leachate is removed regularly, but there is evidence it has "overtopped" into surrounding land at least once.
Continue reading the main story
We appreciate that this news may cause concern to those living close to the park and regular visitors”
End Quote Sarah Evans Wrexham council Of several options presented to the local authority's executive board, it decided the only "long-term sustainable solution" was to re-cap the site, which could cost between £1m-£10m.
Work will involve re-shaping the site to shed water more effectively, and installing a "geosynthetic capping layer over the existing clay".
The site - about 22 of approximately 400 acres - will be closed to the public, but the remainder will stay open.
Wrexham council said residents nearby had been informed by letter and liaison meetings will be held.
Sarah Evans, principal environment protection manager, said: "We appreciate that this news may cause concern to those living close to the park and regular visitors.
"We have undertaken to keep them informed and up to date as work progresses.
"We will also work closely with colleagues in the environment department and external advisors to safeguard the ecology of the area and to ensure the site is returned to its former state."
A contractor is now being sought.
View the original article here

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Woes pile up near dumping yard - Times of India

The GHMC has been dumping about 3,800 metric tonnes (MTs) of garbage daily in the 750-acre dump yard located about 35 kms from the city for the past few years.


Many villages like Haridaspally, Dammaiguda, Nagaram, which are located close to Jawaharnagar dump yard, have been facing ground water pollution due to continuous dumping over the years.




>
>


A few months ago, residents of Cheryala village in Keesara mandal had complained to Lokayukta that the lake in their village `Pedda Chervu' was getting polluted due to the leachate of Jawaharnagar.


Officials said Pedda Chervu is located in the downstream of Malkapur tank, which is close to Jawaharnagar. As leachate of Jawaharnagar was polluting Malkapur tank, water flowing into Pedda Chervu is also getting polluted.


After people complained of water pollution, the GHMC officials, a couple of months ago, had stopped inflows into Pedda Chervu by forming an earthen bund below the Jawaharnagar dump yard to ensure that the leachate does not enter the Malkapur tank.


Since the Pedda Chervu water had already got polluted, the Lokayukta has directed the GHMC to drain out water from the lake. Now, this has become a herculean task for the corporation officials as the tank is under the control of the minor irrigation department. GHMC officials approached the irrigation officials, who in turn sought instructions from the Ranga Reddy district collector.


The district collector did not give permission reportedly due to resentment from other villagers of Rampally, Kundapally and Godumpally, who are down streams of Pedda Chervu. The villagers expressed fear that the drained out lake water from Pedda Chervu might enter their lakes and tanks.


The water pollution in and around Jawaharnagar triggered huge protests three years ago. Villagers of Haridaspally and other villages had staged a dharna and even stopped garbage vehicles proceeding to Jawaharnagar as the dumping yard was not only causing ground water pollution but also roads were getting damaged due to heavy traffic. The GHMC assured them of laying roads, drinking water supply and street lights and other facilities.


While the roads and other facilities were provided, the GHMC recently paid about Rs 2.45 crore to the Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board to supply piped water to the villages of Dammaiguda, Nagaram, Haridaspally, Ahmedguda and Cheriyal apart from Jawaharnagar.


When contacted, GHMC executive engineer D Sudhakar said they have inspected the area on the directions of the Lokayukta and were taking necessary steps for preventing water pollution.


View the original article here